All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on focusing problems at 27/06/2005 - 15:06
However, the *ist-DS is not similar IMHO
There are too many features the *ist-D has that make the *ist-DS a non-replacement:
* AF button on the back (I live off this button)
* Finger wheel and thumb wheel for immediate choice between Av and Tv overriding
* Pop-up flash supports wireless to the AF360 (without having two AF360)
* Pop-up flash can be disabled in wireless mode
* PC flash connector (though, ok I could get away with a hotshoe adapter)
* Extra customisation modes (choice of MTF/Normal/Speed/Depth which are not available on the DS)
* Three customisation memories
* Backlit top LCD (which I do use)
* Wider exposure range
* Exposure bar-graph in viewfinder (now that I would be very, very sorry to lose)
.. maybe others... but perhaps I'll stop there, it's already toooo depressing
And I have 3Gb of high speed Lexar Compact Flash cards for the *ist-D.
Some of those things could be addressed with firmware updates, but not the rest
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on No more *ist-D?? at 24/06/2005 - 15:35
Do they know something we don't?? Or are they just stocking DS & DL?
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on No more *ist-D?? at 24/06/2005 - 13:27
Yes, the 100mm is definitely WOW! The only near equivalent in terms of sharpness is my SMC-F 50mm/f1.7 As a pair they're fab Look forward to some of your work...
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Which Macro Lens for a *istD at 15/07/2005 - 09:15
You'll have lots of fun with that I can assure you!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Which Macro Lens for a *istD at 12/07/2005 - 21:54
The info you need is here: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/index.html
All the f2.8 Pentax lenses are 1x magnification. All the non-f2.8 are 0.5x
The f2.8 macros are wonderful. Just amazing
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Which Macro Lens for a *istD at 26/06/2005 - 21:51
Don't go for that
Comment by MattMatic posted on Which Macro Lens for a *istD at 25/06/2005 - 22:31
Well, I have the SMC-F 100mm/f2.8. Cost me £200 from LCE. It's a heavy beast (put it with the Metz 50MZ5 and I need to eat more meat!!).
It does have quite a bit of chromatic aberration when there are serious highlights, but it is just amazingly sharp. It's one of my favourite lenses on the *ist-D - just beautiful for portraits (though I find you have to smooth the skin in PS otherwise it just shows too much detail )
I've ummd and ahhhd over the new 100mm DA - mostly because of the weight. But I can't really warrant the extra expenditure
If you're interested - www.lcegroup.co.uk have a 100mm/f2.8 on the website (in Exeter), and www.ephotozineshop.com have a mail-order returned SMC-DA 100mm for £350.... just to tempt you further
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Which Macro Lens for a *istD at 23/06/2005 - 15:14
The Z1, although it has the mechanical "finger" would only read from the electronic contacts. If the lens contacts couldn't be read (if they were dirty etc), it wouldn't report the aperture even when the lens had the mechanical parts.
That being the case, I find it puzzling that the *ist-D can't do the same.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Aperture rings, yes or no? at 15/07/2005 - 17:00
Yes, it is a little disappointing, but at least the finger (and thumb on the *ist-D) dials are very sensible.
I suppose it just makes life a little more confusing when switching between film and digital.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Aperture rings, yes or no? at 24/06/2005 - 06:40


My Tokina AT-X 24-200 is parafocal. It works a dream on the Z1, but on the *ist-D it does not - apparently the camera focuses at the hyperfocal distance, which of course changes with focal length.
So, you may find the same with the *ist-DS. Even though the lens may be parafocal, it won't work that way because camera's focusing not quite where you think it is.
Hope that helps
Matt