All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Bokeh wonderings at 03/09/2008 - 12:03
I have noticed that the K10D and *ist-D will not show overexposure when using flash (either internal or external)!
For example:
* Take a high speed lens (like 50mm f/1.4)
* Turn off the flash
* Set the camera to Av mode and pick the widest aperture
* Set it up so the shutter speed shows something like 1/500s
* Now turn on the flash (not in HS mode!)
* Shutter speed shows 1/180!
* Take the shot and it is BLOWN out.
Normally the aperture & shutter speed flashes in the view finder when out-of-band, but it clearly does not when the flash is turned on.
(It's caught me out more than once!)
Now the question - does the K20D do this too?
While I'm on the flash issue... I have, as yet, been unable to find a way to get the camera to meter ambient with flash - except in fully manual. Generally I like to exposure about -1 to -1.5 for the ambient and let the flash fill in. But there doesn't appear to be any way of getting this done automatically (which would be great for function/event photography!)
Let me know what you find...
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Overexposure warning with flash? at 03/09/2008 - 11:57
No, but I almost bought one last time I was up at Srs
If you're serious about colour, then you will definitely need a device - the colour of the display shifts over time and so monthly recalibrations are definitely a good idea (depending on how paranoid/critical/fussy you are).
I can definitely guide you through the PC setup, and can probably fumble my way round the Mac.
Ohh, you can try my DA* if you like.
I can even bring my girlfriend if you wanna try her!!!!!
Maybe you need a break from image editing?
EDIT: ROFL @ Don. And now I'm very hungry...
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Calibrating Monitors - Windows, Linux & Mac at 02/09/2008 - 15:28
That's a very kind offer I'm not that far from you either...
Trouble is it has to be the monitor + the video card You have to calibrate as a system, and not just the monitor.
Do you have a hardware calibration device? Like Spyder/Huey etc? (EDIT: I could set up a remote control access to your machine and guide you through the process)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Calibrating Monitors - Windows, Linux & Mac at 02/09/2008 - 15:13
I can't afford the Mac hardware. Even though I've seen OS X can be installed on Intel PC hardware now (But it's against the Apple EULA - dang!)
Trouble is, I have to use PCs for work - firmware programming, hardware stuff, etc. Much just isn't available for Mac or Linux. I (now) have a great respect for the OS X and just wish I could legally run all three OSs (XP Pro, OS X, and Ubuntu )
Colour management on the Mac was one of the main points of interest... but Argyll definitely narrows the gap
Other thing is the cost of migrating all my apps (CS2 Premium, Silkypix, etc, etc).
Alas, the K20D/DA* is on the wish list first
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Calibrating Monitors - Windows, Linux & Mac at 02/09/2008 - 15:12
(may do an install on a clean HDD with the M200 as there are several issues with that platform - just to test the water!)
TBH, Argyll is a cinch to use - it's just command line based (which scares some people away!) Still learning about it though...
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Calibrating Monitors - Windows, Linux & Mac at 02/09/2008 - 13:49
I'm very short-sighted so have to wear specs all the time and have held off this accessory because of possible vignetting issues... I'd really like to know if it's a worthwhile addition
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Magnifying Eyecup at 02/09/2008 - 12:38
Can I just send my monitors to you. That I can probably do.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Calibrating Monitors - Windows, Linux & Mac at 02/09/2008 - 11:14
I have the Spyder Pro & Spyder 2 Pro - which have seemed great... but the Toshiba M200 was never that hot on colour. There were times when I thought I'd just ditch the lot and move over to Mac
However, after a lot (read a LOT) of searching and reading I have settled on "Argyll CMS" - http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/ArgyllDoc.html
Admittedly I had a few installation issues (detailed below), but now I have moved over to using it on both laptop and desktop - and have to say that there is now much better consistency between the machines. Hooray!!
So, a few hints and pointers:
* If you're using a Spyder, then you have to run "spyd2en" with a Spyder setup CD or EXE file. See here.
* On Windows you MUST change the device driver for the Spyder so that Argyll can see it. See here.
* Ok, so it's all command line based - but it's not difficult...
* Calibrate: "dispcal -v -d 1 -y l -o MyMonitorProfile" - will calibrate monitor #1 as an LCD using medium quality and output both the internal calibration file and the .icm file. Be warned - takes an age (you can add "-q l" to lower the quality and speed it up)
* Loading: "dispwin -d 1 -I MyMonitorProfile.icm" - will install and load the file for monitor #1.
On a dual monitor setup I have a little CMD (ie batch file) that is in the Programs / StartUp group to call "dispwin" for each monitor. This is much quicker than the Spyder software and doesn't have an annoying splash screen (but doesn't remind you to recalibrate).
Of course, the added bonus is that Argyll works on Linux & Mac as well... so when I migrate to Ubuntu/Kubuntu or Mac then I still retain the "know-how"
(And you can install this on as many machines as you need and use a single hardware device to calibrate them all)
Does that help??!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Calibrating Monitors - Windows, Linux & Mac at 02/09/2008 - 10:40
However, note that the one you link is for SATA drives. The one I was referring to was parallel IDE.
...which is a good point for the OP to check before buying a caddy
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Laptop Nightmare at 02/09/2008 - 07:06


Isn't it amazing the variation in bokeh with lenses?
For example, how about this for a Canon 24-105? I love the shot, but the bokeh is definitely not for me
Sigmas also seem to have a characteristic bokeh - more "busy" than the Canon even.
I wonder why Pentax seem to have the "buttery-smooth-melting" bokeh sorted out so well?? (Like the 50/1.4, the 100/2.8, 24-90 etc etc) Except I'm not quite so smitten on the 16-45 bokeh when compared to the 24-90.
Any thoughts?
Matt