Comments made by Mannesty - Page 502

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

OK, found it thanks. It's called Frame Number for the *istD.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Some information.... at 22/10/2008 - 15:27

Clarky wrote:
Why do my shots look a little soft after I have posted them.:

I was thinking the same thing. I thought they looked good . . . for a phone camera

Comment by Mannesty posted on Gold Coast holiday at 22/10/2008 - 14:50

She's obviously contemplating what she can do to get out of going on that b****y bike again.

You can almost sense it . . . "What was that Ferrari diver's name again? . . ."

Comment by Mannesty posted on Gold Coast holiday at 22/10/2008 - 14:08

MattMatic wrote:
There's an internal shot counter (which is visible in the EXIF through PhotoME)

Where is this internal counter in PhotoMe Matt? I've looked for it several times, without success. Does the image have to be a JPG, I use PEF 100%.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Some information.... at 22/10/2008 - 14:03

What's your firmware version? Power off, press and hold the menu button, power on. The version number will appear. If it's not V1.30, update it.

Is it possible that the shutter button wasn't fully depressed for the whole time that the 3 shots were being taken?

Comment by Mannesty posted on K10 - lost images at 22/10/2008 - 14:01

That page needs a password Matt.

Comment by Mannesty posted on My 16-50 DA* and 50-135 DA* are duffers.... Anyone with similar problems please enlighten me. at 22/10/2008 - 12:36

Firstly, switch to AF and check the images again.
Do you get the hexagon in the viewfinder that is the only positive confirmation that you have correct focus?
If you have SR turned on, are you waiting for the 'shaky hand' to appear in the viewfinder which is the only positive confirmation that SR has stabilised.

Comment by Mannesty posted on My 16-50 DA* and 50-135 DA* are duffers.... Anyone with similar problems please enlighten me. at 22/10/2008 - 12:02

What's to 'seriously consider'? Go for it.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Possible misprice Jessops Pentax 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DA ED Lens at 22/10/2008 - 11:56

MattMatic wrote:
Ouch!
That hurts seeing that K20D refurb price having just bought one new only a little while ago And still not sold the K10D to help fund it...
Dang!
Matt

Same here Matt. I did get the cash back though. To be fair, if you wait for prices to come down too far, you'll wait forever . . . then a new body is announced, and you wait again.

Who'd have thought that refurb'd K20D's would be available so soon anyway?

Chris is a good egg though, he's always been fair with me. I'll not buy anywhere else.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Some information.... at 22/10/2008 - 11:54

I have these two lenses also. I'm on my third 16-50, the previous two both had focussing issues. The 50-135 is brilliant, no problems with that one.

Search this forum for focus charts to find other threads about focussing issues and how to adjust it.

Which camera are you using?

Being blonde has nothing to do with your problem, really.

Comment by Mannesty posted on My 16-50 DA* and 50-135 DA* are duffers.... Anyone with similar problems please enlighten me. at 22/10/2008 - 11:48

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Mannesty

All Forum Comments

All Forum Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Proudly supporting Pentax User