All Forum Comments
Comment by Mandrake posted on What To Do With All These Pixels? at 28/07/2013 - 11:49
The camera meter reading was not locked and exif shows both shots at exactly same shutter speed, aperture etc (as would be, as settings were at manual)and also shows same time recorded and they were in same lighting conditions.
Comment by Mandrake posted on What's your highest ever daily 'photo tally'? at 26/07/2013 - 13:27
The kit lens doesn't have an aperture ring though, so if you go down the extension tube route then you'll need ones with the aperture contacts and they're relatively rare.
Here are a couple of examples from the kit lens with no extra attachments:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/simon_morgan/8466407200/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/simon_morgan/8524352911/
In the end though, after considering all the options I just went and bought a brand new Tamron 90mm Macro and love it!
Comment by Mandrake posted on I want to try Macro at 11/07/2013 - 23:51
Comment by Mandrake posted on File Count Number Display Thingy at 09/07/2013 - 21:45
Excellent job getting it to work. I'd quite like to see what that whole setup looks like, too.
Comment by Mandrake posted on Pentax Q with100 year old lens at 21/06/2013 - 22:43
Interesting - where did you find the information about the gyro sensors? I'd be curious to find out more if a more technical breakdown of the SR system has been published somewhere than the usual marketing guff that just tries to dazzle you with buzzwords.
Comment by Mandrake posted on Shake Reduction and 'action' photography at 09/05/2013 - 21:10
I suspect that the success or otherwise of SR during panning is largely down to the panning technique. The camera detects movement ('shake') using three angular velocity gyro sensors (not accelerometers). The signal is high pass filtered - i.e. only angular velocities above a set value are used. Hence panning should not affect SR as long as the pan rate is low enough or if it is a translational pan rather than a rotation (the sensors do not detect linear velocity).
So, rotating your whole body rather than just the camera should have a better chance of success.
Comment by Mandrake posted on Shake Reduction and 'action' photography at 08/05/2013 - 20:10
Firstly this is because however much people bang on about seeing the beauty around you, I do fundamentally spend most days going to work in an industrial estate - I don't see that many photogenic subjects on an average work day! Except for my kids, of course, but I'm deliberately trying to avoid just taking pictures of them to try to maintain some variety.
Secondly, I found it did start to feel like a bit of a chore - like I have to carry my camera so I can meet the quote - and I think it's good to have a bit of a breather. Occasionally just enjoy things for what they are and not for how they might look in a picture.
Comment by Mandrake posted on 3 reasons people's photography doesn't improve at 07/05/2013 - 20:55
Comment by Mandrake posted on Motorsport: Prescott hillclimb, April 27 at 03/05/2013 - 21:04


I take a fairly brutal approach on importing to Lightroom. I delete all the total crap immediately (out of focus, hugely misexposed etc.) then for each group of similar shots I will generally flag one as a "pick" if it's actually good, maybe keep one or two others if they're nearly as good and delete any remaining hangers-on. The survivors then get the post-processing treatment.
This saves time doing post-processing and means I can open any subject/event folder and only have decent shots to look at, and filtering for picks gives me just the best. The other side effect of spending time culling the similar shots is that it makes me think about what makes one better than another, and that has taught me a lot. In fact I've often said that the best thing you can do to learn how to take better photos is to spend time deleting your crap ones.
Obviously this is all from the point of view of an enthusiastic amateur - professionals no doubt have completely different issues to consider.