loskeran

Joined: 8th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

loskeran
scottthehat wrote:
better af system more fps,
Thats a start Scott

Comment by loskeran posted on K20 replacement at 21/07/2009 - 14:28

loskeran
What would you like Pentax to include or leave out when they replace the K20 as a “Mid Range” body?
You never know Pentax may even take up some ideas

Comment by loskeran posted on K20 replacement at 21/07/2009 - 14:14

loskeran
In A word, yes

Comment by loskeran posted on Samsung gx 20 with Sigma EF-DG 530 Super at 20/07/2009 - 15:11

loskeran
The Tamron being much newer than the Sigma, answers one thing the earlier S-wide Tamron was not so good, I have used/owned the Sigma 10-20mm and found it excellent, but that was on a Nikon body, You may be able to get one (Sigma) at a better price as the new HSM is being launched now, but not in Pentax mount just yet.
But if you intend to do use it in wet or dusty conditions then Pentax has the only choice, a DA* lens.

Comment by loskeran posted on Calling Tamron 10-24mm owners at 20/07/2009 - 09:12

loskeran
So in other words Mike, stear clear of the HSM lenses if you want to do video on you K7, Or tele converters with HSM lenses.

Comment by loskeran posted on K-7 and Sigma HSM lenses at 19/07/2009 - 18:00

loskeran
“Dust and weather proof”,water resistant, not submersion proof and neither is the K7, well I would not like to go diving with one, far too expensive to trash.

Comment by loskeran posted on waterproof cameras? at 19/07/2009 - 16:19

loskeran
All the DA* lenses (Pro)

Comment by loskeran posted on waterproof cameras? at 19/07/2009 - 14:46

loskeran
Bush/ heavy plant/”sign heavy plant”- road crossing=

Comment by loskeran posted on Saw this on Flickr at 19/07/2009 - 08:49

loskeran
aminstar wrote:
I am lost here, whose page is that one? Whos is he?
someone with a sense of humour

Comment by loskeran posted on Saw this on Flickr at 19/07/2009 - 08:42

loskeran
Cloudhunter wrote:
I dont like Jessops only because they sold me a second hand camera once and then tried to say i had used it. Only when i took the camera out and turned it on and showed them the pics in the built up memory of the sales chap pulling funny faces did they refund me. Silly behaviour as i would never shop with them again.

If they do that to lots of other people then you can see why they are on their arse.
Most, I say Most of Jessops staff these days as long as they can speak and turn up to collect their wages, (part time or should I say limited time, in more and more cases), and no photographic skills whatsoever, and are trained to say “You want one of these” and hand you a “starter” Canon/Nikon camera, when you ask for a semipro body.
Why are Jessops so rubbish now? When years ago you could walk into a Jessops store and ask for a reversing ring, and not be told “the jewellers are next door”.
Try it some time, If you can come out of the shop door without laughing.
I rather think the demise of Jessops is sad really but I will be first in the queue for some sale gems, that is if I can beat Mike P.

Comment by loskeran posted on Another Jessops thread at 19/07/2009 - 08:36

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo