kh1234567890

Joined: 13th September 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

kh1234567890
+1 for keeping the 16-45, unless there is something wrong with the one that you have.

If size and handling bother you, then how about a Limited prime, such as the DA21 ?

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on Upgrading from Pentax 16-45 f4 - what to buy? at 27/06/2017 - 00:31

kh1234567890
The UK restrictions appear to allow cameras as carry on. Basically, no-one knows.

https://www.gov.uk/hand-luggage-restrictions/electronic-devices-and-electrical-i...

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on No more digital cameras allowed in carry on baggage at 22/03/2017 - 09:09

kh1234567890
To me it looks as if all that was needed was a bit of fine AF adjust tweak - in the first frame it was front focusing. Also with that lens f5.6 is just about wide open at 50mm, the extra stop in the second shot will make a difference.

My DA18-55WR still gets used

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on K-50 & 18-55mm AL WR lens image quality at 10/02/2017 - 23:07

kh1234567890

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on any advice for a shoot in the Lake district at 18/11/2016 - 17:14

kh1234567890
You could always nip up to Castlerigg for a bit of mysterious foreground. Best of luck with actually being able to see the sun this time of the year though ...

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on any advice for a shoot in the Lake district at 18/11/2016 - 09:47

kh1234567890
I got one of these a while ago but I can't say that I've actually ever used it in anger. It will fit all the DA Ltds (15/21/35macro/40/70) but it is a bit of a struggle with lens hoods and end caps attached and the case dividers fitted. Also, the prospect of dropping all my Limiteds into the mud somewhere or someone walking off with them scares me ...

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on DA Limited Lens Case 2 at 10/10/2016 - 08:30

kh1234567890
The highlight correction is basically a digital fiddle - the camera underexposes by one stop (shoots at ISO one stop lower than set) and then does a 'histogram shift' so that the highlights are just under the clip limits. When I'd looked at the RAW histograms with RawDigger it seemed to be a straight linear multiply (on a K-5ii) - I suspect that the DPR K-30 curves are plotted from JPEGs after gamma mapping.

The shadow correction did not appear to do anything to the RAW values, again on a K-5ii.

I keep the highlight correction on all the time - it does what it is supposed to do - as long as you realise that it has only one stop range, any highlights brighter that that will still get clipped.

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on Highlight and shadow control in settings at 29/09/2016 - 11:56

kh1234567890
Actually, the highlight correction does affect RAW files. The shadow correction doesn't.

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on Highlight and shadow control in settings at 28/09/2016 - 20:22

kh1234567890
Lucky you. I don't think that I've ever been there when it wasn't raining

Comment Image
Castlerigg Stone Circle by Karel Hladky, on Flickr

Comment by kh1234567890 posted on Castlerigg stone circle at 28/07/2016 - 15:50

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo