All Forum Comments
Same issue as the 50-135mm. Who has one, is it any good and is it justified? Bought the 100mm Macro a couple of weeks back so I'm thinking I need a light for the end of it....
Regards
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on AF160 C Ringflash at 21/10/2009 - 17:48
You beet me to it. I bought the 16-50 f/2.8 and have just bought the 50-135 f/2.8 purely for speed and extra low light shooting ability.
I already use a 70-200 f/2.8. The ability to keep shooting for 10 mins or so can matter.
Regards
I already use a 70-200 f/2.8. The ability to keep shooting for 10 mins or so can matter.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Canon 1D MK IV Announced - Who needs FF? at 21/10/2009 - 17:46
Mongoose wrote:
Very nice shot, I hope it sells well!
Totally agree with your comments, its just that I don't think that I have ever heard salesmen advising one brand over another because of picture quality, hence my comment.K10D wrote:
Not so sure about the final comment as I run multi systems and it isn't due to image quality.
I think that's the OP's point. Baring a few specific situations final real world image quality is brand independant. It's the other features which one should base ones system choice on. But the easiest way to pull the wool over the eyes of the punter in a camera shop is to tell him he's buying better image quality.Not so sure about the final comment as I run multi systems and it isn't due to image quality.
Very nice shot, I hope it sells well!
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Vulcan XH558 @ RIAT 2009 at 21/10/2009 - 16:38
Very good image Rob.
Not so sure about the final comment as I run multi systems and it isn't due to image quality.
Regards
Not so sure about the final comment as I run multi systems and it isn't due to image quality.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Vulcan XH558 @ RIAT 2009 at 21/10/2009 - 16:12
Welcome David. Your still here and that's what counts.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Hello from me at 21/10/2009 - 15:58
Well done Mike. Good record.
Regards
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on PPG Acceptance. at 21/10/2009 - 15:52
Clarky wrote:
Well I haven't got it yet, its still in transit. so I will have to wait and see. Its coming from Zurich, all the way too Aust. I hope it doesn't get a sunburn.
It is silly money really, and probably not worth it in regards to higher IQ.
I had a few excess lenses laying about and the oportunity came up to get the Voigtlander, so I took it. I don't think I will regret it, as they hold thier value pretty well and I can always sell it on if the need arose.
I'm still saving for a 400 f/2.8, that has to come from the USA as the UK prices are car prices.Well I haven't got it yet, its still in transit. so I will have to wait and see. Its coming from Zurich, all the way too Aust. I hope it doesn't get a sunburn.
It is silly money really, and probably not worth it in regards to higher IQ.
I had a few excess lenses laying about and the oportunity came up to get the Voigtlander, so I took it. I don't think I will regret it, as they hold thier value pretty well and I can always sell it on if the need arose.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on For Sale, Pentax FA 100mm 2.8 Macro at 21/10/2009 - 13:37
link
Not HDR though.
Regards