All Forum Comments
thoughton wrote:
I hope so!
(PS I'm only replying to your first sentence because that's the only one I understood )
So we digress from the OP.I hope so!
(PS I'm only replying to your first sentence because that's the only one I understood )
A one litre bottle of Russian Standard takes a wee effort to empty.
The time taken qualifies as stand or fall.
Typing this I am listening to Giu' La Testa by Ennio Morricone. From the movie "A Fist Full Of Dynamite".
I love weekends.
Hello? Next track is Go Wild in The Country by Bow Wow Wow....
Lost the plot or what???????????????
Comment by K10D posted on One picture at a time, please at 26/06/2010 - 00:33
thoughton wrote:
I see this thread grew 3 extra pages in a very short time - I've read them all and am still not sure what's got people so fired up! From what I can see K10D said something ambiguous, and Andrew and Gareth were both mysteriously offended by the 'fewer images' plea from George.
The slow broadband folks want fewer images per thread. That's fine, I for one will start adding [n images] to my thread titles, to give those people a chance to opt out. The other people who (like me) often post multiple images per thread could do the same (Andrew, Gareth, that's you guys ), that way you will avoid the Wrath of George™
So George is happy he doesn't have to download a big thread. Myself, Andrew, Gareth and others will be happy we can continue posting multiple images if we so desire, and the members who don't enjoy critiquing a photo will be happy they can just continue saying 'nice shot', and the members who like critiques can continue to critique whatever they want.
There. Problem solved, everybody happy. *brushes dust off hands*
Does this qualify as common sense?I see this thread grew 3 extra pages in a very short time - I've read them all and am still not sure what's got people so fired up! From what I can see K10D said something ambiguous, and Andrew and Gareth were both mysteriously offended by the 'fewer images' plea from George.
The slow broadband folks want fewer images per thread. That's fine, I for one will start adding [n images] to my thread titles, to give those people a chance to opt out. The other people who (like me) often post multiple images per thread could do the same (Andrew, Gareth, that's you guys ), that way you will avoid the Wrath of George™
So George is happy he doesn't have to download a big thread. Myself, Andrew, Gareth and others will be happy we can continue posting multiple images if we so desire, and the members who don't enjoy critiquing a photo will be happy they can just continue saying 'nice shot', and the members who like critiques can continue to critique whatever they want.
There. Problem solved, everybody happy. *brushes dust off hands*
Meanwhile back at the iPod and Russian Standard, it's the weekend.
(not demeaning your post)
the clock ticks between pleasure and collapse........
I got to admit it's gettin better
Comment by K10D posted on One picture at a time, please at 26/06/2010 - 00:19
George Lazarette wrote:
Whoops! Sorry. Forgot you were posting in the wrong forum. It's a bit sad that you have to come here for advice. One can only conclude that Nikon users must be an ignorant and unhelpful bunch.
You are, of course, always welcome here. Even when you can't resist the urge to remind us that the Nikon system contains a 200mm f2 lens.
G
PS: In your position, I would get out a tape measure and take some measurements. Much easier to learn from real life than from dry theory.
George, your black & white.RR wrote:
It's lucky I don't have the cash in the bank, as this would be the perfect "excuse" to indulge my LBA & buy the 200mm f2
Pentax don't make a 200mm f2.It's lucky I don't have the cash in the bank, as this would be the perfect "excuse" to indulge my LBA & buy the 200mm f2
Whoops! Sorry. Forgot you were posting in the wrong forum. It's a bit sad that you have to come here for advice. One can only conclude that Nikon users must be an ignorant and unhelpful bunch.
You are, of course, always welcome here. Even when you can't resist the urge to remind us that the Nikon system contains a 200mm f2 lens.
G
PS: In your position, I would get out a tape measure and take some measurements. Much easier to learn from real life than from dry theory.
No grey?
That aside, as a Nikon user (and Pentaxian) I do agree with you. Bit of a kick in the gonads to the OP though. We here have respect for being tolerant and forgiving, offering advice, direction and an open minded reception of questions (he says whilst listening to the theme music from Fried Green tomatoes).
Weekend, chillax, and as always, respect and best regards.
Comment by K10D posted on What lens for full body isolation ? at 26/06/2010 - 00:06
fatspider wrote:
I would love to join you Gary but unfortunately Ive got my own offspring arriving for a BBQ tomorrow and your a bit out of the way for me to come and drink your beer and get a taxi home
Have a good time.
Taxi not needed sir.I would love to join you Gary but unfortunately Ive got my own offspring arriving for a BBQ tomorrow and your a bit out of the way for me to come and drink your beer and get a taxi home
Have a good time.
That aside. Family first!
Have a good one and at least one glass for me as I'll raise one for you.
Best regards
Gary
YET ANOTHER B-LLSH-TTER. Funny really, I went through this a long time back. You still have self respect. What a cracking lesson for you.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on charity event at 25/06/2010 - 23:32
If your not pre-booked tomorrow evening and are within reasonable distance of TS19, and are hungry and thirsty, please PM me for address. Very large chance of B&B so don't fret.
It's open. Good food, plenty O swally, and chilled atmosphere.....
All non attendee's respected.
It's open. Good food, plenty O swally, and chilled atmosphere.....
All non attendee's respected.
New Topic about to appear.......
Comment by K10D posted on One picture at a time, please at 25/06/2010 - 23:12
fatspider wrote:
Quote:
I was thanking John and Mike for answering my query about RPS
I was thanking John and Mike for answering my query about RPS
Quote:
Any sense of direction here
I dont know why we have a topic called "Another Pointless Thread", they all seem to become pointless eventuallyAny sense of direction here
Comment by K10D posted on One picture at a time, please at 25/06/2010 - 23:12
robbie_d wrote:
Any sense of direction here?fatspider wrote:
I was thanking John and Mike for answering my query about RPS, etc.! robbie_d wrote:
Cheers guys.
I dont think thats needed Rob, its just well deserved praise for a post with some thought behind it, most of my post are made with cotton wool between the earsCheers guys.
BBQ@ TS19 tomorrow night............
Comment by K10D posted on One picture at a time, please at 25/06/2010 - 23:00
Sorry, it's Friday and I have to chill.
Does a pinch of salt do it for you?