All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on Why NIKON is King at 01/07/2010 - 23:03
JonSchick wrote:
Doesn't go into exhaustive detail, but for once the reviewer actually seems to understand the market that the K-7 is aimed at (and comments that it feels like it has been built for a very different market segment). It comes down to a choice between the Canon and the Pentax, and his overall winner was the K-7.
Two friends of mine that use Canon 550D's have used my K7 and D700 and have said they like the feel/handling of the K7. They are both professionals. They still use the 550D's as of the late May Bank Holiday, they said they have too much Canon glass to jump ship?Doesn't go into exhaustive detail, but for once the reviewer actually seems to understand the market that the K-7 is aimed at (and comments that it feels like it has been built for a very different market segment). It comes down to a choice between the Canon and the Pentax, and his overall winner was the K-7.
Each to their own.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on UK mag comparative test...K-7 wins! at 01/07/2010 - 21:47
Mike-P wrote:
Living in an area of the UK a wee bit North of you, (I lived in the New Forest area some years ago, 1988, whilst working near Southampton)some of the lads up here do drink a large swally or two. Not sure if it they out-slurp the Aussie lads and lasses.K10D wrote:
Aus seems a dead cert for relieving ones bladder whilst in the salt water to act as a jelly deterrent and pre-emptive sting medication...
Maybe that's why they (reportedly) drink all that beer Aus seems a dead cert for relieving ones bladder whilst in the salt water to act as a jelly deterrent and pre-emptive sting medication...
Regards
Mike-P wrote:
Not into box jellies or blue rings, I think I'll be keeping my feet dry Mike. Aus seems a dead cert for relieving ones bladder whilst in the salt water to act as a jelly deterrent and pre-emptive sting medication...K10D wrote:
That said, once I acquire the Aussie mind set....s--t happens..
Regards
At that point don't you sell all the camera gear to buy a surf board and crates of beer?That said, once I acquire the Aussie mind set....s--t happens..
Regards
Maybe the Aussie's will find me odd? My uni tutor said I was and he was edificated.
Regards
Mike-P wrote:
Get your priorities right.
Do you know my wife by any chance Mike.....?K10D wrote:
That suggestion Mike, is tempting?????
Down side is that I have to buy a house, car and microwave first...
Regards
You have a house .. you don't have a K-x.That suggestion Mike, is tempting?????
Down side is that I have to buy a house, car and microwave first...
Regards
Get your priorities right.
I'd be happy with a tent and Aussie Cabernet, but once my beloved arrives.....she would be non too happy and hotel rates are not cheap...
That said, once I acquire the Aussie mind set....s--t happens..
Regards
Mike-P wrote:
K-7 and buy a K-x out there.
My next body was going to be an Alpha 850 (for all the wrong reasons). All of my Minolta glass is FF yet I love my Maxum 7D (same sensor as istD).K-7 and buy a K-x out there.
That suggestion Mike, is tempting?????
Down side is that I have to buy a house, car and microwave first...
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on K20 still sold in Perth??? at 01/07/2010 - 20:15
cardiff_gareth wrote:
I think I'd take the K7 and the K10. Wow, not having a grip on my GX10, that'd just feel sooooo weird
If your just taking 2 lenses then how about the 18-55 WR and also I think you have a 70-200 f2.8?
Maybe take a TC also :
Lenses are (this minute) 10-17mm, 16-50mm, 50-135, 70-200. + 1.4TC and AF1.7TC. Logic says leave the 70-200 and use the 50-135 with the AF1.7 as I have said in other threads, that combination is fast and furious AF compared to SDM.I think I'd take the K7 and the K10. Wow, not having a grip on my GX10, that'd just feel sooooo weird
If your just taking 2 lenses then how about the 18-55 WR and also I think you have a 70-200 f2.8?
Maybe take a TC also :
Regards
Anvh wrote:
Thank you Hefty for the explanation.
Still my mind can't really grasp it.
The lens has a smaller angle of view on APS-C sensor so it should behave like a 42mm shift lens on 135 format right?
I'm probably well off target with this Anvh, but I think the the shift is more effective at the image edges, hence we lose that when we crop in. I tried my 28 shift in my istD and could not see any beneficial effect. Much better when it was used on my LX.Thank you Hefty for the explanation.
Still my mind can't really grasp it.
The lens has a smaller angle of view on APS-C sensor so it should behave like a 42mm shift lens on 135 format right?
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Shift Lens at 01/07/2010 - 20:07


Both Ricehigh and Ken Rockforbrain have been discussed ad nauseam on every forum. Both are nitwits of the highest order.
G
Regards