All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on Ok Ok I know! 17-70 Vs 16-50 at 05/03/2012 - 12:25

Saw it and thought about this thread.
To filter or not to filter, that is the question.
While your arguing your points of view, retailers are selling filters based on cold, hard sales techniques.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Ok Ok I know! 17-70 Vs 16-50 at 05/03/2012 - 12:01
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Margaret River WA at 05/03/2012 - 11:52
Comment by K10D posted on Margaret River WA at 05/03/2012 - 09:15
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on I hate shopping at 04/03/2012 - 14:00
Waste of a thread as it is on the home page
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on New Firmware at 02/03/2012 - 22:51
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on New Firmware at 01/03/2012 - 06:35
link
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Filter test with spectrometer at 29/02/2012 - 04:41
Obviously you need to pull manual focus first and then let the TC snap to final focus.
No doubt that on a K5 it will be even quicker.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on 50-135mm + AF1.7x TC at 27/02/2012 - 23:24

Camera Maker: PENTAX
Camera Model: PENTAX K-7
Image Date: 2010-02-13 14:09:05 +0800
Focal Length: 0.0mm (35mm equivalent: 0mm)
Aperture: f/8.0
Exposure Time: 0.0029 s (1/350)
ISO equiv: 200
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Center Weight
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB
GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined
Photographer: G.Catterick
Copyright: G.Catterick
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on 50-135mm + AF1.7x TC at 27/02/2012 - 13:38







If Filters are such a waste of time and money etc.,
As some people say, loss of light, not sharp and other optical deficiencies are there to be seen? So that evidence as well as me only shooting JPEG's and not RAW may explain the lack of sharpness, detail and contrast on my images.
Thinking positively, I have plenty of room to improve!!
Best regards