All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on 'SR' on or 'SR' off? at 19/11/2012 - 11:15
In practical terms, we can see for ourselves that SR will enable us to use much slower shutter speeds than we could previously. It is not a panacea. At higher shutter speeds and with moving subjects clearly we might be better off not using SR. It certainly won't stop subject movement.
However, caution regarding the tests linked to. I noticed the phrase "rapid lateral movements" as the test method. I'm not sure that rapid lateral movements are normal camera shake....
Comment by johnriley posted on 'SR' on or 'SR' off? at 19/11/2012 - 09:56
Comment by johnriley posted on I bought a Sigma 28mm F/2.8 Filtermatic Wide Angle Lens at 18/11/2012 - 23:56
Comment by johnriley posted on lonely streets at 18/11/2012 - 21:54
It was poor in the K-5
Nothing poor about it.
Comment by johnriley posted on 'SR' on or 'SR' off? at 18/11/2012 - 21:43
Comment by johnriley posted on Tabletop Tripods at 18/11/2012 - 13:47
Got a 50/1.2 yet John? If not you should
Comment by johnriley posted on Is it worth buying ? at 17/11/2012 - 08:12
Comment by johnriley posted on Joint effort at 16/11/2012 - 17:59
The new 18-270mm will no doubt replace it at some future time, when the price has dropped. Based on the Tamron tests published, it may well be an improvement in performance as well as range.
Comment by johnriley posted on what to buy in the 18-250 range? at 16/11/2012 - 10:57
A quote for an overhaul seems a good idea, hope it doesn't prove to be more expensive than buying a good second hand sample.
Comment by johnriley posted on 645 experience at 16/11/2012 - 10:31

