All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Sharpening in Photoshop at 16/12/2012 - 22:59
What I would be interested in, though, is how your sharpening differs for different sizes of images.
Comment by johnriley posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 16/12/2012 - 20:50
How do I do it from Photobucket please?
Comment by johnriley posted on How to post images new! at 16/12/2012 - 19:47
Yes, but John, all that has been done beforehand for each image. Why would you want to do that on output?
All the publishing process does is convert your already processed images to jpegs, with a sharpening for output to screen if you so desire, and then send it all to Flickr.
It in no way replaces the fine adjustments that you have described that have been done previously in Develop.
I think you're describing things from the point of view of an entirely different workflow. I've got six articles here on PU that describe a very simple workflow and which summarise what I might do. See the articles section and you'll know straight away if we're talking about different approaches.
Comment by johnriley posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 16/12/2012 - 19:34
Why would you want to adjust levels?
Sharpening can also be fine tuned for a particular image, not necessarily globally.
It depends how much control we want over the final result.
Comment by johnriley posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 16/12/2012 - 16:39
Lightroom will create all the jpegs in the background and send them to Flickr
Comment by johnriley posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 16/12/2012 - 15:46
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax calendar at 16/12/2012 - 15:07
The outgoing Q body is also available at what loooks like a clearance price of £99, again from SRS and eBay. Excellent news, if you don't have one here's your chance!
Always nice to have the heads up on bargains! I'll put this is Leads to Deals.
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax Full Frame at 16/12/2012 - 13:35
As a rule, this section is for people to buy and sell Pentax-related items here rather than link to adverts/auctions elsewhere.
Comment by johnriley posted on K10d and K5 for sale at 16/12/2012 - 13:08
Comment by johnriley posted on K01 Auto Iso - Minimum Iso at 15/12/2012 - 18:59


As little as needed avoids haloes and other artifacts, and Unsharp Mask is my tool of choice. I have used this from Photoshop 7 through to CS5, which I currently use.
Unsharp Mask, Threshold 3, Radius and amount depending upon size of final image and image factors. In terms of amount, web images are usually 1000 pixels on the longest side, which fits in with EPZ requirements. It is convenient to make just this one size wherever possible. Radius is around 1.1 to 1.4 pixels and amount about 50% for a K20D or K-5 and ambout 75% for a Q. Different types of sensor behave differently and cameras themselves have different characteristics of JPEG sharpening. For DSLRs +1 sharpening in camera is already set by me.
For A3 prints, a larger radius of pixels as there are so many more pixels in any dimension of the image, so usually 2.2 or therabouts. Sharpening for print needs to be slightly higher, so 100% to 125% is the norm. For other sizes, we can make something in between these two sets of values.
Hopefully my web images look sharp but not over sharp, and likewise my prints.
The technique of converting to LAB mode and just sharpening the luminance (black and white) channel is useful for architectural subjects as the colour information is not affected at all, so we end up with an underlying very sharp image with no artefacts in the colour channels. We convert back to RGB before saving for print.
In recent times, using LAB colour as an intermediate step has not seemed so necessary so I can only presume that the algorithms have been improved in each upgrade of Photoshop.
Comments and questions most welcome.