It doesn't. What it does do is behave more predictably with the metering system. I think adding more complication is unhelpful to the beginner.

A camera meter only measures light, it's up to us to know and understand how to modify that reading. Just practice.

Again though, why start with difficult metering situations? First, master normal situations and then that can be built upon.

There's no mystique about it, it just needs practice, practice, practice.

Only in the context of the problem presented. To expand, the best place to start, IMHO, is with a current lens. With a new camera the worst place to start, again IMHO, is with something that needs special care and attention.

Yes, older lenses can be very rewarding, but not until we are a little more familiar with our new camera.

I find the main problem with reviews of this type is that they are far too long winded and chatty. I just wish they'd get on with it and cut to the chase.

No contest IMHO. I just love that 645D and it's worth every penny. All I need to do is be able to afford it.

A very old lens like this is not the best to use with a modern sensor. Some are good, but you'd be better off with a DA lens from the current range.

There are clearly problems with the image, from masses of over-exposure to what may be a RAW converter problem.

Very debateable, but I didn't watch to the end. A review of the D800E is off topic for Pentax User, but they did use the 645D as well.

Changing cameras doesn't change our innate ability, so unless you have lots of spare cash I'd invest in travelling to some interesting locations instead.

I'm not so sure that I'd let any website have a complete list of my kit. Once that gets hacked, and it will, then someone could have a free shopping list.

Better to look after our property IMHO.

I would assess the risks and costs.

What is the value of the equipment? How likely is it that it would be damaged or stolen? If it's always with me, not very likely it would be stolen? What would the excess be compared to the annual cost totting up and compared to the individual items? Not much point insuring a £50 lens if the excess is £100? What exclusions are there?

Photo insurance can be quite expensive IMHO, so an extension on the house contents policy ("All Risks")could be a much lower cost alternative.

Cars also get very hot, so I wouldn't leave any kit in the car in any event. Just at the moment seals would probably become sticky or deformed and the expansion of glass against metal or plastic could also cause problems.

It's very hot out there!

Thank you MrB, you beat me to it.

The instruction manual is a wonderful source of information!