PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Thanks all, it's an interesting concept and seems to be proving popular.

Andrew, to be fair there's lots of shadow detail in the JPEG file as well, but the rules of engagement don't allow for it to be adjusted. That's where digital does become much more like slide photography, in that the highlights need to be preserved and the shadows have to fall where they may. Most slide films would have a dynamic range of no more than 5 stops, some even less.

This is a scene that would block up entirely in the shadows with original Orwochrome film, but would have stood a good chance with Kodachrome.

Comment by johnriley posted on ADAPS Straight Out of Camera Competition at 05/12/2014 - 08:16

johnriley
Tonight we had out annual Joe Jackson Straight Out of Camera Competition. It was Joe's idea to have this challenge, where images are shot JPEG and no adjustments whatsoever are allowed. This tests our exposure and composition skills and forces us to work a bit harder at the capture stage. When Joe died his widow Margaret kindly donated a trophy, which she presented tonight as well.

I'm delighted that I won the competition, with this image:
Comment Image


And also delighted that Sue came third with this:
Comment Image


All comments welcome!

Comment by johnriley posted on ADAPS Straight Out of Camera Competition at 04/12/2014 - 23:21

johnriley
It's a great idea.

Comment by johnriley posted on The Swap at 04/12/2014 - 22:34

johnriley
Somebody has to pay the initial higher price, just like somebody had to buy the original 645D at its launch price. If they didn't, there would be no 645Z now.

Somebody must have paid £700 for an LED calculator at one point.

Comment by johnriley posted on Existing Owners Just Ecstatic at 04/12/2014 - 08:31

johnriley
I'm going to tidy up all the other posts that repeat this. This is the correct forum for it, so we can leave it here.

Don't worry, it will be noticed without spreading it over several forums!

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 645 55mm for sale at 03/12/2014 - 22:46

johnriley
Ironically, a test report this week in AP gives a camera a negative because it's not APS-C.......

Comment by johnriley posted on Why we don't need FF at 03/12/2014 - 22:42

johnriley
Ah, I was judging last night, that must be why.

Comment by johnriley posted on Re: Pentax mirrorless at 03/12/2014 - 17:06

johnriley
The only EVFs Pentax do are the rather poor ones in the bridge cameras. I would always use the back screen with these.

As for Sony, it's really off topic for us here, but in a generalised sense I wouldn't welcome them as a way forward. They lag and smear, and for the reasons Nigel mentioned at some point they change our relationship with the subject. We end up looking at a screen rather than looking through the viewfinder at the live scene. The screen brings its own interpretation between us and the subject.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax mirrorless SLR at 03/12/2014 - 16:40

johnriley
Sue and I have registered via the e-mail invitation they send out. We'll be there, but which day is not certain.

Comment by johnriley posted on photo show nec at 03/12/2014 - 15:34

johnriley
I see.

Quote:
How many people have taken how many photos over ISO 25,000?
Yes, sometimes, but rarely. Those settings are for emergency or creative use and not intended for architectural poster prints. When I come across a Martian landing at dusk I'll be very glad I have those settings.

Comment by johnriley posted on Re: Pentax mirrorless at 03/12/2014 - 15:32

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo