Existing Owners Just Ecstatic

K10D
Posted 04/12/2014 - 01:35 Link
Existing Blad owners must be really happy with the price collapse of the H5D having paid big money for theirs.

Obviously the launch of the 645Z had nothing to do with this new pricing structure.

link

Either way, more choice within the same price range can only be good news for photographers.

Best regards
Too far from a shore.
50mpCMOS
Posted 04/12/2014 - 02:51 Link
Those price level changes were announced many months ago to Hasselblad owners and prospective owners. Most of the price level changes were due directly to upgrades in sensor technology; Hasselblad moving to CMOS. Almost all of the new CMOS level sensors have not changed prices (at all) since their release not all that long ago.

But these new CMOS sensor units will also eventually go down in price (only) once new Hasselblad technology does get released.

Hasselblad still does hold the undisputed lead in medium format; especially in terms of build quality, and (even more so) optics.
K10D
Posted 04/12/2014 - 06:44 Link
We learn something everyday, there was me giving credit to Fujinon for the H lenses.

I believe their new technology will involve DMOS photoelectric sensors.
Too far from a shore.
johnriley
Posted 04/12/2014 - 08:31 Link
Somebody has to pay the initial higher price, just like somebody had to buy the original 645D at its launch price. If they didn't, there would be no 645Z now.

Somebody must have paid £700 for an LED calculator at one point.
Best regards, John
walkeja
Posted 04/12/2014 - 11:09 Link
johnriley wrote:

Somebody must have paid £700 for an LED calculator at one point.
No, they were never that expensive.
Pentax K1-ii and MZ6
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Algernon
Posted 04/12/2014 - 11:33 Link
I paid £170 for a Sharp calculator in 1970/72? One of the earliest ever made.
That's about £2,200 in today's pennies


--
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
alfpics
Posted 04/12/2014 - 11:49 Link
walkeja wrote:
johnriley wrote:

Somebody must have paid £700 for an LED calculator at one point.
No, they were never that expensive.
Algernon wrote:
I paid £170 for a Sharp calculator in 1970/72? One of the earliest ever made.
That's about £2,200 in today's pennies


--
HP scientific ones were well over £200! (I didn't buy one though!)
Andy

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo