All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Lenny Henry's Pentax. at 07/07/2015 - 15:19
Comment by johnriley posted on K-3 or K-3 II? at 07/07/2015 - 13:42

First up is a worn but fully operational ME Super body. The metal top and bottom plates are heavily worn, even worn right through in a couple of places. However, it works and could be useful in high roisk environments where it is expendible, such as caving.
The lens is the SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/1.7 and it's in very nice condition. operating smoothly, clear glass and cosmetically excellent.
The two items together priced at £30 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £35.00

This is the MV plus SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/2 lens. Lovely throughout except for one small fungus spot in the lens. Excellent spare body, that lens fungus needs attention.
The two items together priced at £20 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £25.00

MV-1 plus SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/2 lens. The description of the lens just like the previous one, with that one spot of fungus again. The body has wear on the paint on metal parts, but fully operational and usable.
This package priced also at £20 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £25.00

ME Winder II in very nice condition. Thankfully stored without batteries in it.
Priced at £10 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £15.00
There may be some more items soon, but that's it for now. Any questions, please ask.
Comment by johnriley posted on M Series Goodies, Lenses and Bodies at 07/07/2015 - 13:39
Think there should 3rd/4th options for voting: " I have a k-3 and will/will not be buying a K-3II"
I didn't vote for me, but I voted for Sue, who said she definitely wanted a flash built in.
Comment by johnriley posted on K-3 or K-3 II? at 07/07/2015 - 13:22
Comment by johnriley posted on Some Blurry Sheep at 07/07/2015 - 10:22
Comment by johnriley posted on Some Blurry Sheep at 07/07/2015 - 09:15
How has SR improved?
Comment by johnriley posted on K-3 or K-3 II? at 07/07/2015 - 09:11
Comment by johnriley posted on Not a really a point an shoot. WG-4 at 06/07/2015 - 20:05


In practice, I have seen very few, if an, images that actually look good with the zero depth of field that we get around f/1.