PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Canon had a f/0.95 lens for their Canon 7 rangefinder in the late 1950s/early 1960s. The two items as a kit were called the "Canon Dream".

In practice, I have seen very few, if an, images that actually look good with the zero depth of field that we get around f/1.

Comment by johnriley posted on Lenny Henry's Pentax. at 07/07/2015 - 15:19

johnriley
Fair enough Gwyn, but if you feel inclined to vote that would be a vote presumably for the K-3?

Comment by johnriley posted on K-3 or K-3 II? at 07/07/2015 - 13:42

johnriley
I have a few items that I'm offering here first.
Comment Image

First up is a worn but fully operational ME Super body. The metal top and bottom plates are heavily worn, even worn right through in a couple of places. However, it works and could be useful in high roisk environments where it is expendible, such as caving.
The lens is the SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/1.7 and it's in very nice condition. operating smoothly, clear glass and cosmetically excellent.
The two items together priced at £30 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £35.00

Comment Image

This is the MV plus SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/2 lens. Lovely throughout except for one small fungus spot in the lens. Excellent spare body, that lens fungus needs attention.
The two items together priced at £20 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £25.00

Comment Image

MV-1 plus SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/2 lens. The description of the lens just like the previous one, with that one spot of fungus again. The body has wear on the paint on metal parts, but fully operational and usable.
This package priced also at £20 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £25.00

Comment Image

ME Winder II in very nice condition. Thankfully stored without batteries in it.
Priced at £10 plus £5 towards UK postage. Total £15.00

There may be some more items soon, but that's it for now. Any questions, please ask.

Comment by johnriley posted on M Series Goodies, Lenses and Bodies at 07/07/2015 - 13:39

johnriley
jeallen01 wrote:
Think there should 3rd/4th options for voting: " I have a k-3 and will/will not be buying a K-3II"
I was just interested in how many would choose one or the other, so choose the one you would buy now if you didn't have a K-3 already.

I didn't vote for me, but I voted for Sue, who said she definitely wanted a flash built in.

Comment by johnriley posted on K-3 or K-3 II? at 07/07/2015 - 13:22

johnriley
Now it's back.

Comment by johnriley posted on Some Blurry Sheep at 07/07/2015 - 10:22

johnriley
A whiteout at the moment, the picture is "no longer available"?

Comment by johnriley posted on Some Blurry Sheep at 07/07/2015 - 09:15

johnriley
SteveLedger wrote:
How has SR improved?
The SR system has been upgraded, which perhaps is what makes the high resolution mode possible.

Comment by johnriley posted on K-3 or K-3 II? at 07/07/2015 - 09:11

johnriley
The Like button has been working fine, but it isn't tonight. I'll ask IT to look at it tomorrow.

Comment by johnriley posted on Like at 06/07/2015 - 23:37

johnriley
If we're in a hurry, it's nice to be able to just show appreciation without having to post a message. It's just a "thumbs up" of approval. Maybe a full comment isn't always necessary?

Comment by johnriley posted on Like at 06/07/2015 - 23:32

johnriley
It's a good shot, although I'm not sure why it would cause any difficulties. If you like your images darker, then you could leave some negative exposure compensation switched in.

Comment by johnriley posted on Not a really a point an shoot. WG-4 at 06/07/2015 - 20:05

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo