All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on *ist DS on the way at 20/05/2005 - 23:42
Do let us know how you get on!
Comment by johnriley posted on *ist DS on the way at 17/05/2005 - 17:52
I realise that the automated processing during film development may have altered the effects of the original exposure to a certain extent.
The reduced exposure latitude of slide film is also a good discipline.
Comment by johnriley posted on sfxn flash questions at 30/06/2005 - 06:34
The same will apply to the Soligor if it has an "A" setting on the aperture ring. If not, then it will be useable with some restrictions.
I'm not sure about the converter, so I'll let someone else take that one up...
Comment by johnriley posted on P30 lens on a digital *ist DS at 16/05/2005 - 10:10
If you have M series, K series or screw mount lenses (via the adapter) then you will need to activate a custom function to allow use of the aperture ring, and you will have limited exposure options. The lenses will be useable, however.
Comment by johnriley posted on P30 lens on a digital *ist DS at 16/05/2005 - 07:36
My first idea really would to claim on my insurance for a repair/replacement as necessary. If you are suitably insured either on special photographic insurance or the household policy all risks section, then all may be well.
If you are not insured, I think I would send it to Pentax or one of the other pentax repair houses for a quotation.
What else can you do?
Comment by johnriley posted on *istD Disaster at 15/05/2005 - 19:08
My preferred method is to meter off something predictable and then adjust the setting. Sunlit grass and clear blue sky are about 18% grey reflectance, so are zone 5. Typical skin tone is one stop lighter, as is tarmac on the road, say zone 6. White walls are zone 8 if you want a hint of detail. So for a white wall to remain white, meter it and then increase exposure by three stops....Simple! This all applies well to negative film.
CCDs and slide film do not want any over-exposure at all, to avoid washed out areas. Just make sure that you meter the actual subject and not masses of dark or light areas and there should be no problem in taking a general centre-weighted reading. A little tweak one way or the other will come naturally in time.
CCDs are actually the one time I use matrix metering, and I really haven't found a problem. With slides I use aperture priority centre-weighted metering. For black and white film I use manual exposure and spot or centre-weighted metering so I can ensure good shadow detail.
Comment by johnriley posted on Light meter recommendations at 17/05/2005 - 07:40
The SMC Pentax-M 100mm f4 is compact and superb. Flare is virtually non-existent. Flatness of field is excellent. Corner to corner sharpness exemplary.
I think they are a world apart in terms of design and performance. I'm sure you will be delighted with the pentax lens if that is what you go for.
Comment by johnriley posted on pentax 100/f4.0 macro vs tamron 90/f2.5 at 15/05/2005 - 19:11
Not quite the answer to your question, but certainly a way around the problem!
Comment by johnriley posted on Optio S50 - can't transfer from camera to pc at 13/05/2005 - 23:28
Sue and I use the best quality JPEG setting, as this can be directly used in Photoshop and any other application.


Have fun and shoot lots of great pictures!