PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Perhaps he was just hungry and thought no-one else could do it right...

But you are right, passion is the thing.

Comment by johnriley posted on PENTAX site Check it Out at 16/05/2007 - 15:43

johnriley
Thanks for the link - very impressive images.

Comment by johnriley posted on PENTAX site Check it Out at 15/05/2007 - 22:22

johnriley
Found it as the bottom of page 220.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K10D LCD display at 15/05/2007 - 10:14

johnriley
Somewhere in the instruction manual (I can't find it just now) there are comments about the camera needing to reset under some circumstances. It is a computer of sorts so taking the battery out, leaving it for a short while and then re-inserting the battery might enable a restart.

If I am remembering correctly it might have something to do with a build up of static.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K10D LCD display at 15/05/2007 - 10:04

johnriley
It's all an illusion anyway:

Comment Image


[/quote]

Comment by johnriley posted on Dogs with the 135mm f2.5 SMC Takumar at 15/05/2007 - 11:28

johnriley
Personally, whether I expected to take a masterpiece or not, I would shoot at maximum resolution just in case. I would hate to witness the first Martian landing and only have the K10D set at 6MP.

It hasn't happened yet, but there's always tomorrow...

Comment by johnriley posted on Dogs with the 135mm f2.5 SMC Takumar at 14/05/2007 - 17:31

johnriley
Pentax viewfinders are probably the best currently available, especially the pentaprism ones.

The answer as to why so many are small is probably that manufacturers try to minimise the size of the cameras. This is not helped by the smaller dimensions of the APS-C sensors.

It is also true that not everyone uses manual focus so the need to provide aids for this has reduced.

I don't think anything will change, but if you want to see an incredible viewfinder then have a look through a 1959 Voigtlander Bessamatic and just marvel at the clarity. This is because only the central portion is a focusing ground glass and the main part of the field is an aerial image. But it is incredible and gives a benchmark to judge from.

The next best viewfinder is probably the Pentax 67....

Comment by johnriley posted on Why do we put up with small viewfinders? at 13/05/2007 - 19:52

johnriley
I actually think you've done just fine - I like the colours of your image and it shows movement. Excellent.

If you still really want to try something else why not look at flowing water or maybe time-lapse photography?

Comment by johnriley posted on Really Struggling with movement image Help required at 13/05/2007 - 19:57

johnriley
There used to be a huge market in out of date film. Sometimes it can last for a surprisingly long time.

Paper is more suspect, but it's only a couple of years ago that I was given some 1950s Agfa paper. Some of it made some good prints, most of it was badly fogged.

You can add defogging agents to developers, but just offhand I can't bring to mind an example. Try an old book on darkroom chemistry - I'll have a look later to see if I can find something in my library.

Comment by johnriley posted on Bulk film lifetime at 13/05/2007 - 08:58

johnriley
I don't know how you converted to BW, but try Channel Mixer in PS7. It starts out as 100% red by default, and this on its own could have most of the effect you need, but just mess around with the sliders, probably reducing blue and adjusting red and green until you have the right result.

Comment by johnriley posted on Red Heads + Black & White at 11/05/2007 - 23:16

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo