All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on 50mm 1.7 M aperture question at 14/12/2007 - 16:00
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax Magazine - July 95 at 30/05/2008 - 16:38
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax Magazine - July 95 at 14/12/2007 - 15:26
Comment by johnriley posted on me super lenses at 14/12/2007 - 08:31
Comment by johnriley posted on Best wishes at 14/12/2007 - 14:33
Also, I agree it's a bit tight in the frame.
Comment by johnriley posted on Sparrow - Critic please at 13/12/2007 - 16:54
Comment by johnriley posted on One of these for Xmas please Santa!! at 13/12/2007 - 18:29
When you have some images, why not post a few for us to have a look at?
Comment by johnriley posted on Had a problem with K100D at 12/12/2007 - 23:08
At 7.5m distortion is -0.6% (12mm) -0.2% (18mm) + or - 0.05% (24mm)
At 25m -0.46% -0.15% 0.15%
at Infinity -0.31% -0.1% No value
These are remarkable results and a superb bonus to such a useful ultra-wide lens.
Comment by johnriley posted on Looking for feedback regarding DA 18-250mm. at 14/12/2007 - 14:44
A wall or building could serve, but a closer subject is useful to see how distance affects things.
If you have a critical use in mind, then something at the same distance as you would normally be working is appropriate.
A flat document will show diistortion up very quickly. General shots disguise the distortion very effectively, so are not the best way to evaluate it.
Hope that helps!
Comment by johnriley posted on Looking for feedback regarding DA 18-250mm. at 14/12/2007 - 07:57


This means manual exposure only and stop down operation.
It does work, and it is a cracking lens. Using it at f1.7 all the time would be very limiting though.