All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on The old chestnut: 16-45? 18-50? or even 15-30 with 28-70 at 23/12/2007 - 13:54
I wonder what the next competition will be?
Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Competition No.25 - "Christmas!" at 01/01/2008 - 02:13
Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Competition No.25 - "Christmas!" at 26/12/2007 - 13:20
I care little for (and trust less) magazine tests.
Happily, the new AP tests to actually go into some sensible detail and back this up with some data in the form of measurements and graphs. Much better than usual and also explained well. Credit where credit is due.
The sister site to this one, Photodo, also has lots of good information, but it does of course need interpreting properly.
Comment by johnriley posted on New lens - quick walk at 29/12/2007 - 17:59
Comment by johnriley posted on New lens - quick walk at 29/12/2007 - 17:38
Comment by johnriley posted on New lens - quick walk at 29/12/2007 - 16:58
I am looking forward to when your 10-17 gets an airing
Comment by johnriley posted on New lens - quick walk at 29/12/2007 - 16:17
Comment by johnriley posted on New lens - quick walk at 29/12/2007 - 14:47
It seems to be normal, so if everything is working OK I wouldn't worry!
Comment by johnriley posted on Clunk in K10 at 28/12/2007 - 11:05
I wouldn't expect the CCD shift to be as large as the movement I have just been listening to.
Comment by johnriley posted on Clunk in K10 at 28/12/2007 - 10:14



Seriously though, 24mm equivalent is more exciting than 28mm equivalent, so on that basis the 16-45mm is usefully wider, and quite reasonably priced. It is also a cracking good lens, so you won't need to upgrade it again on that score.
You already have a 50mm f1.4 for when you need speed. You can always up the ISO when needed anyway. I have often used the 16-45mm for handheld shots at night. No problem, especially now we have SR as well. It is also relatively compact compared to the f2.8 lens.