Just to add a small but important point regarding depth of field.

Whilst it is true that small formats have greater DOF, they also have a far higher requirement for accurate placement of the sensor/film plane. This is because they have very limited depth of focus this being the amount of leeway available at the sensor/film plane. This was the downfall of the 110 film format, because sufficient precision could not be reliably attained.

Why not post a couple of your favourites to start with? Trying to comment on them all is a bit of a task!

Yes, it must indeed be getting late. No need to be tetchy fellas, it will all be OK in the morning....

It must be getting late!

The tiger looks fine on my monitor, possibly a little over-sharpened for my taste but we don't know if that is just the resizing for the web that has caused that. The water is quite an odd colour - is that how it was?

Nice tight crop.

Caveat Emptor means "let the buyer beware" and simply means that the risk is with the buyer. The USA is a long way away and there is a tangible and real risk that a package will go astray or be damaged in transit. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen.

All buyers should bear this in mind - it applies to all personal sales - so insurance would probably be a good idea. I actually routinely insure items I send on eBay sales, even if the buyer has not asked for it, but over a certain cost it makes sense for both buyer and seller to be protected.

Caveat Emptor

Thanks for all the comments. Bearing all these in mind, I will have another go!

Not all Nortons are bad then...

Nothing wrong with your advice, Matt!

I started on Windows 3.1 but was much happier when Windows 95 arrived.

I had one print that turned out so well that I had to repeat it properly in Photoshop. What happened to the print is that one of the colours became blocked, but the effect was totally surreal and I liked it.