PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Quote:
Always reversed and the crack has been on the thin piece of plastic left were you to take out the slide bit.
Maybe this makes it a bit tight in the bag and puts the hood under stress?

I don't reverse the hoods, but put them separately in the Billingham Hadley Pro. There's enough room to do this. So far, no problems with any hoods apart from the 1970s square clip on one for the 50mm. I'll exclude this as a problem because it's basically been used for so long on so many 50mm lenses that it's just fair wear and tear.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax lens Hoods at 09/04/2010 - 17:28

johnriley
axl wrote:
Thanks, maybe there is serial # database which would tell me...
hope one of the guys you named will chime in
Unfortunately the Pentax serial numbers are very convoluted, with different lenses sharing the same serial number range and very poor factory records.

The only thing I can suggest is very carefully looking at a lens to see what differences in minor detail there might be. For example, engraving, ribbing on the focusing ring, and so on.

Comment by johnriley posted on How to tell versions of K50/1.2 apart? at 09/04/2010 - 16:23

johnriley
Washing machine, paint brishes, lighter fuel, rinsing under taps, Mr Sheen.......I feel almost too weak to respond to all that. I may have nightmares for weeks. Thankfully nobody mentioned dishwashers.

A soft dry cotton cloth or microfibre cloth. If necessary, a slightly damp cloth. That's it, nothing more.

The best way to clean a camera is not to let it get dirty in the first place, but if it does then as little as possible to clean it.

Comment by johnriley posted on Cleaning of kit at 09/04/2010 - 15:10

johnriley
Hmm, not convinced about that. Have you used the Pentax 1000mm and 2000mm mirror lenses?

The Tamron mirrors I have tried have been OK but not as good as refractive lenses. They are also relatively fragile and easily knocked out of alignment.

Comment by johnriley posted on Another of those rare SMC-mirrors is back at 09/04/2010 - 08:35

johnriley
In terms of lenses a camera lens and a camera objective are the same thing and they don't change whether they are on or off a camera.

"I used a 100mm objective" as the same as "I used a 100mm lens" or "I used a 100mm job" - it depends upon the individual writer's preferences.

English is a very rich and varied language that has more words than any other, so one idea or item can often be described in many different ways.

Comment by johnriley posted on Objective? at 09/04/2010 - 08:18

johnriley
The Pentax mirror lenses are the real thing, not just another cheap mirror lens. All the marque mirrors will be very expensive. The £99 mirror lenses are not in the same league!

Comment by johnriley posted on Another of those rare SMC-mirrors is back at 09/04/2010 - 08:13

johnriley
Apparently it was passed late last night, but some sections were dropped. Court orders are now required to close websites, no sweeping powers being available without them.

The Orphan Works clause has been dropped I think.

All in all, having been rushed through with little scrutiny, I'm sure it will have all sorts of unforseen effects and the lawyers will be happy for a very lomg time.

Comment by johnriley posted on Orphan Works and the Digital Bill at 08/04/2010 - 16:49

johnriley
Posting smaller images (in terms of file size) would be helpful - those took an age to load. Aim for 200K if possible.

Comment by johnriley posted on For Sale: Pentax FA 50mm F1.4 with box at 08/04/2010 - 11:47

johnriley
It's been put on hold, so we'll have to see what happens after 6th May.

Comment by johnriley posted on Orphan Works and the Digital Bill at 08/04/2010 - 11:41

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo