Welcome, you seem to have arrived OK!

If you have any pictures to share, let's see them in the Your Photos section.

Hope you enjoy the site!

Any film can be developed into a black and white negative, even Kodachrome.

By all means make a point Algi, but arguing ridiculous points doesn't help. At best it's irrelevant, at worst it can mislead beginners who are trying to understand something.

The subject of this thread is a review of the KP, so a good idea to get back to that I think.

I've moved this into the Lenses section, a little late in the day maybe, but it's not a Your Photos thread!

I should imagine anyone using tethered viewing then is going to have a real problem with parallax....

It must be the first of April.

Fair question Peter. The answer is very mundane I'm afraid, I've been using Sue's K-5 to make the product shots for the ePHOTOzine lens reviews. The reason for that is that we took the strap off that one so it doesn't get in the way of anything when used on a tripod.

I told you the answer was mundane.....

Sue and I have both upgraded our APS-C cameras, plus we now have the K-1 as well, so there are two K-5 bodies for sale.

Sue's camera has a shutter count of 17,925 and mine has a count of 17,690. Both were manufactured 08/03/2011, which I presume means 3rd August as I took the data from the USA forum.

Both cameras have been cosseted and cared for and are in pristine condition. Both are fully functional in every respect. Both have the boxes and accessories.

UK only sales, the price is £200 each including tracked delivery. Payment by PayPal or cheque please.

Any questions, please ask. I haven't done any photos yet as we all know what a pristine K-5 looks like, but if necessary I will in due course.

I'm not sure what you are trying to prove, but if it's about perspective then you need a 3D subject rather than a flat one.

I can see that the images are not the same though, as they show a different field of view and a slightly different magnification.

I don't know that this subject is the best to try with PSR as no matter how much the camera is kept still the moon is moving quite rapidly across the sky. Perhaps the artefact is just that movement not being compensated for by the software.