All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Which to keep, what else to buy... at 04/07/2010 - 00:25
Minor thing maybe, but in the stress and turmoil of a shoot it can be significant.
Comment by johnriley posted on Lens hood for 50mm FA 1.4? at 03/07/2010 - 11:23
The alternative is to use the lenses in the way we would normally use them and form a judgement based on that. If the photography involved was, for example, document copying, then the macro lens would be the obvious choice from the start.
Comment by johnriley posted on The Sub £50 Lens Guide at 03/07/2010 - 11:20
Well the last one cost me £8.50 but it is the correct and most efficient hood for the job. Hmmm....I might, but it would hurt.
Comment by johnriley posted on Lens hood for 50mm FA 1.4? at 03/07/2010 - 10:16
Comment by johnriley posted on The Sub £50 Lens Guide at 03/07/2010 - 09:39
Comment by johnriley posted on K-x debug explanation please at 03/07/2010 - 09:36
Just out of curiosity, does it mention safety cut out in the instruction manual?
Comment by johnriley posted on Is my AF540 flashgun....on strike, or what? at 03/07/2010 - 09:33
Comment by johnriley posted on Lens hood for 50mm FA 1.4? at 02/07/2010 - 22:30
Comment by johnriley posted on Lens hood for 50mm FA 1.4? at 02/07/2010 - 21:50
Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 02/07/2010 - 21:49


I'd have an interesting time selling most of them on eBay, after which you will get better photographic resulots by looking at some basic Pentax digital lenses.
For low cost, 18-55mm WR and 50-200mm WR lenses, plus keep a fast manual focus 50mm.
For wider versatility, 55-300mm instead of the 50-200mm.
For added wide angle capability add 12-24mm.
For added close up capability add 100mm f2.8 Macro, WR version if you can afford the extra.
If you just enjoy lenses and want to play with them and experiment a lot, then keep on buying like you have done and see what you can find and what it's like.
It's meant to be fun, so go for it!