PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
I have read the forum thread linked to and can see no justification for called DxO malware. :

Comment by johnriley posted on DXO 6.5.1 New Download... at 03/12/2010 - 10:02

johnriley
I don't think the Post Offcie keep SD packages for long, so he needs to get in collected urgently.

Comment by johnriley posted on My new K-5- What a disaster but THANK YOU SRS at 02/12/2010 - 16:12

johnriley
Anvh wrote:
You lost me John....
The printer use CMYK colour space to print, how can it be a RGB device if it doesn't use those colours?

I use ProPhotoRGB through the whole process because i use the RAW file all the time, i'm not sure how photoshop handles it when it sends to the printer but never found that the colours are out too much.
The printer accepts an RGB image from the computer and translates it into CMYK for printing. That's how they all work, but it doesn't really matter. We have no input into that apart from keeping the colour space correct all along the work path.

Your profile may or may not get to the printer, depending upon what you have asked Photoshop to do. If you haven't done anything, then it may be that PS is converting your image to sRGB before sending it, or even ignoring the profile altogether. You need to check your colour preferences and see if PS or the printer is the one that's controlling the colour.

Comment by johnriley posted on Photoshop Elements displays images too brightly at 02/12/2010 - 14:07

johnriley
All printers print using CMYK inks, but they are actually RGB devices.

Comment by johnriley posted on Photoshop Elements displays images too brightly at 02/12/2010 - 12:46

johnriley
Check you are working in sRGB throughout - camera, Photoshop all need to be the same colour space. Your computer monitor and printer are sRGB devices anyway.

Comment by johnriley posted on Photoshop Elements displays images too brightly at 02/12/2010 - 12:23

johnriley
There's little difference either way Gareth....

Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Comp #177 - The Culinary Competition: Discussion at 02/12/2010 - 12:19

johnriley
I wonder what people mean by "build quality" - it's one of those wonderfully vague terms that could mean almost anything. Some might think it means made of metal, heavy and solid. I could imagine some manufacturers adding weight into a design purely to fool us.

When I look at the D-FA 100mm macro I see a compact lens, solidly built but not over-heavy, with impeccable finish. Results are excellent and it's far more compact than the FA version that I eventually sold on.

What do you see?

Comment by johnriley posted on Thinking of picking up a Macro... at 02/12/2010 - 12:18

johnriley
All posts but one have been removed. I agree with ken, but FWIW the information is at least relevant in this thread!

Comment by johnriley posted on ist DS problem! Hope I can fix it :( at 02/12/2010 - 11:41

johnriley
Your best bet, in a list of fairly unrealistic ones, would be to look for one of the following lenses:

Quartz-Takumar 85mm f3.5
Ultra-Achromatic Takumar 85mm f4.5
Ultra-Achromatic Takumar 300mm f5.6

These use Quartz and Fluorite elements, are highly specialised lenses and I can't think of many general purpose reasons that one would be needed.

However, if you can find one and have a couple of grand to spare....

Comment by johnriley posted on true apochromatic lenses at 02/12/2010 - 11:39

johnriley
Who could resist the call? My entry is posted, but it was a bit tough to eat.

Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Comp #177 - The Culinary Competition: Discussion at 02/12/2010 - 10:27

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo