PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Robin, I've noticed you aren't a PU Plus member. The 70mm was definitely restricted, but the 31mm may not be, probably something to do with the ongoing fine tuning of the website.

You can definitely see the 70mm review on ePHOTOzine.

Comment by johnriley posted on Some new lenses at 04/07/2011 - 22:19

johnriley
Payment sent via PayPal.

Comment by johnriley posted on FS: Tokina 80-400 at 04/07/2011 - 19:44

johnriley
Robin, go to the new Reviews tab at the top of the page and the two reviews are side by side.

Stefan, good question. There are different aspects to value for money. Given the quality of the lens, if we compare it with say an equivalent Leica (it is good enough to make a valid comparison) then it is superb value for money.

The caveat is that of course for many, the £1039 price tag will be totally out of reach and therefore a disadvantage is the high cost.

I don't see this as a contradiction, just an unfortunate fact of life. When I was starting out in photography as a keen 17 year-old such a lens as the 31mm would have been just a distant dream.

Comment by johnriley posted on Some new lenses at 04/07/2011 - 19:24

johnriley
The first of the reviews is here:

https://www.pentaxuser.com/review/smc-pentax-fa-31mm-f-1-8-al-limited-lens-revie...

and also on ePHOTOzine.

Comment by johnriley posted on Some new lenses at 04/07/2011 - 15:40

johnriley
Right in what way?

Most of these things seem to be confrontational for the sake of it, regardless of any rights and wrongs.

Comment by johnriley posted on street photography is NOT an offence at 04/07/2011 - 00:15

johnriley
Thank you. It's odd, but probably quite a few British people do think that the Freanch eat frog's legs. If they don't, I wonder where it came from.

Things get passed on, but of course few of us actually check up on these things to see if they are, or even were, accurate.

To be honest, not many people call the French "frogs" either.

Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Competition #207 France: Discussions at 03/07/2011 - 23:41

johnriley
Please use English in the forums so everyone can understand what is being said.

Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Competition #207 France: Discussions at 03/07/2011 - 23:17

johnriley
Welcome, and don't worry, my riches are somewhat exaggerated and spent quickly enough!

As regards LBA, there is no known cure. Thankfully...

Comment by johnriley posted on Hi from Austria at 03/07/2011 - 20:48

johnriley
We are spoiled rotten by modern viewfinders. In the past the tiny, dim and hardly usable viewfinders were commonplace. The exception was the wonderful aerial image viewfinder of say the Voigtlander Bessamatic, which would be a revelation even today.

The Pentax pentaprism finder was just incredible and to this day remains one of the best available.

Waist level finders for 35mm cameras are not very effective because the focusing screen is just 36x24mm, far too small to be easily viewed.

Comment by johnriley posted on LX FF-! Viewfinder dimensions at 03/07/2011 - 20:25

johnriley
Sigma reverse-engineer their lenses, avoiding licensing the various mount versions. As a consequence they don't always report properly, depending on the camera body involved.

Comment by johnriley posted on Kayak photo - question at 03/07/2011 - 19:49

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo