All Forum Comments
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on Help me to decide. K-3 or stick to K-5 ? at 14/12/2013 - 20:49
Early adopters - could you tell us how the aa filter simulator is controlled, and is it easy and quick to access?
As regards AF performance, in the Chris Niccolls YouTube review he found the lens to be hunting when quickly focussed on near and far objects. I carried out a similar test on a very dull day using the Pentax 17-70 and 50-135 lenses and experienced no hunting at all. It locked on to near and far targets instantly. The only hunting I have experienced so far is when trying to focus indoors on objects with very little contrast in very poor light. Otherwise focussing on static objects is superb. I've not yet had an opportunity to test continuous focus in any meaningful way.
Jim
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on K3 handling at 13/11/2013 - 11:34
Having come to the K3 via K5 and K5 IIs I have to reluctantly say that I don't find the K3 particularly comfortable to use. Specifically, I find the cut-out in the grip places my middle finger about 4mm too high, resulting in the front e-dial feeling too low for the index finger and my thumb riding too high on the rear pad (quite remote from the 4-way controller). Also, holding down the AF mode button while turning the front e-dial feels quite awkward to me. These issues are rather more pronounced with heavier lenses than with the lightweight LTDs so perhaps the D-BG5 will help when it arrives?
I appreciate that this is very much subjective due to different hand sizes, etc, but what are the feelings of other owners so far?
I have to say that in most other respects this is so far proving to be quite an amazing camera.
Jim
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on K3 handling at 12/11/2013 - 17:09
I've contacted Metz to ask whether a firmware upgrade for the K-3 is forthcoming (or necessary). The last firmware version 4.0 took care of the K-5 II.
Probably the answer that might be expected at this stage and Fletcher8's report of using Metz flash with K-3 in Auto-mode (not TTL) is encouraging.
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on Just upgraded to K3 at 04/11/2013 - 14:15
I managed to open K-3 DNG files OK in LR4
I've contacted Metz to ask whether a firmware upgrade for the K-3 is forthcoming (or necessary). The last firmware version 4.0 took care of the K-5 II.
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on Just upgraded to K3 at 03/11/2013 - 20:14
The larger PEF/DNG file sizes of the K-3 will also put pressure on hard-drive storage/backup. I have plenty of spare capacity at present but others may not have.
Anyone thinking of buying the K-3 needs to factor in these potential extra costs but hopefully it will be worth every penny.
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on Just upgraded to K3 at 03/11/2013 - 11:27
That was a very nice camera to own. I just hope the K-3 proves to be a worthy successor.
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on FS: Pentax K-5 IIs plus grip at 01/11/2013 - 16:40
Jim
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on FS: Pentax K-5 IIs plus grip at 31/10/2013 - 20:26
The K-5 IIs DSLR is still for sale and I have a couple of serious enquiries. Just to deal with a few queries: This is the IIs model, the 's' denoting no low-pass filter for more detailed images. Shutter actuations are 6,015. There is just over two months of the warranty period remaining. Reason for sale is K-3 on order.
If anyone has any other queries please post or PM.
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on FS: Pentax K-5 IIs plus grip at 29/10/2013 - 10:31
Also offered is my D-BG4 grip which is in mint condition, full working order and includes original packaging, etc. Price is £125 to include RMSD.
Comment by Jimbro66 posted on FS: Pentax K-5 IIs plus grip at 28/10/2013 - 15:03


1) Landscapes: Tripod. 100 ISO. Mirror locked. DA primes. Raw. Crop, if required & post process carefully. Print large. (I like my images to generally be sharp across the frame, except when deliberately soft, eg in mist, framed by trees etc.)
2) Wildlife: Especially birds in flight. High ISO. 300mm. I like these images to be sharp at the point of interest)
I'm thinking that for 1) the K-3 will be better as there will be no noise issues, it will be sharper and I'll be able to crop more. However, how will the images actually compare for IQ ? Colours, contrast ... ?
For 2) The noise of the K-3 will be worse, but the AF will be better. I've no idea what's best here. Again I'm suspecting that the AF improvements will swing it in favour of the K-3.
For 2) BIF the K-3 advantage lessens. As someone who very often shoots at ISO 3200 and 6400 there is no doubt in my mind that the K-3's images are a little noisier compared to the K-5/K-5 IIs. I've also not seen a significant improvement in AF.C but that might be due to my own limitations.
Many years ago an older and much wiser man told me to remember that for everything gained there is always something lost. Over the years I've seen that dictum proved time and again. The K-3 is no exception but overall it is a better specified camera. It comes down to budget: I had the available cash so I bought the K-3 and have no regrets. If I had not had the cash I would have been quite happy to stay with the K-5 IIs.
Regards
Jim