hoopsontoast

Joined: 10th June 2013

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

hoopsontoast
If you have something like the MZ-7, it can be used with newer DA lenses that lack an aperture ring, although as mentioned, most will vignette.
Lenses like the DA40, DA*55 and DA70 work well on 35mm sized cameras aparently. Of course you have the current FA Limited (31mm, 43mm and 77mm) that are designed for 35mm cameras.

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on Pentax lenses for our film cameras. at 30/10/2014 - 20:39

hoopsontoast
I picked up a K55 f1.8 for around £40 last month and its a great portrait lens, it has really nice bokeh, not the razor sharp wide open that I get with my K85 f1.8 but still pretty good for such a cheap lens.
Brilliant build quality too from the K-Series.

K55:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hoopsontoast/15633264905/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hoopsontoast/15013171093/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hoopsontoast/15447158528/

The K85:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hoopsontoast/15202834436/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hoopsontoast/15093907405/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hoopsontoast/14936710865/

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on Searching for portrait lens on a budget at 28/10/2014 - 07:58

hoopsontoast
Still here.

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on FS: Sigma 28-200mm f3.8-5.6 Pentax Fit at 29/09/2014 - 17:24

hoopsontoast
Lovely copy! I'm on my second, its great on film/FF
Catch them while you can....

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on FS: SMC PENTAX FA 20-35mm F4 AL at 27/09/2014 - 08:09

hoopsontoast
I would only really take £40 inc delivery, mint ones go between £80-£100 on ebay.

I have tested it on my K-01 and MZ-5N (although not shot any photos on film).

Only photo I have with the 28-200mm and @200mm (even if the exif says smc PENTAX-F 35-105mm F4-5.6, no idea why)

Comment Image

Super-Moon by RSdesignUK, on Flickr

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on FS: Sigma 28-200mm f3.8-5.6 Pentax Fit at 24/09/2014 - 19:13

hoopsontoast
Hi,
Yes it is.
Cheers, Rob

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on FS: Sigma 28-200mm f3.8-5.6 Pentax Fit at 24/09/2014 - 18:28

hoopsontoast
pentaxian450 wrote:
hoopsontoast wrote:
at least you would not need as fast lenses if the high ISO performance is better.
The fast lenses are still a must for shallow depth of field.
But then I have found the best for shallow DOF is to use MF older lenses anyway.

The Pentax advantage is its small primes. There is no reason why they could not have a standard range of small, light and sharp primes with a few select fast/larger equivalents for the people that want them.

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on Full frame at 24/09/2014 - 13:35

hoopsontoast
Smeggypants wrote:
hoopsontoast wrote:
There is the potential for the lenses to be lighter/smaller or at least you would not need as fast lenses if the high ISO performance is better.
Fast lenses aren't just for higher light gathering they are used for shallower depth of fields.
I guess..... f2.8 on APS-C is sort of equivalent as f4 on FF anyway when it comes to DOF........

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on Full frame at 23/09/2014 - 15:31

hoopsontoast
There is the potential for the lenses to be lighter/smaller or at least you would not need as fast lenses if the high ISO performance is better.

This is somewhere where Pentax, I feel could create a USP in the FF market with their range of existing relatively compact/light FA Limited Primes in the 31mm, 43mm and 77mm. Along with potentially a proper FF version of the 40mm & 70mm in the DA Limiteds. The FA 28mm, 35mm and 50mm f1.4 are also all quite compact too.
Thats only missing an UWA Prime (FA20) or Zoom (FA20-35) re work and a standard 24-70mm zoom.

My FA20-35 is an example of this, about the same size, if not smaller than my DA14 and a lot lighter too. There of course is the DA15 which is a little lighter and about 2/3rds the size of the FA20-35 though.
Of course its not as fast but I dont really use the f2.8 aperture apart from very low light or I want some background isolation from a subject.

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on Full frame at 23/09/2014 - 14:53

hoopsontoast
A FF (135 sized Sensor) sits roughly halfway inbetween an APS-C and the 645D/Z Sized Sensor.
Of course, the sensor in a FF camera is likely to be a lot cheaper than the 645 sensor.
That would be the advantage, to bridge the gap between the ~£1k K3 and the ~£7k 645Z.

Comment Image

Comment by hoopsontoast posted on Full frame at 23/09/2014 - 12:09

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo