George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
I don't think you are right, Arthur.

In any mode other than Manual, the camera will not stop the lens down. So although it will expose correctly (by adjusting the shutter speed), it will not give you the aperture you want. Whatever the aperture is set at, the picture will be taken at full aperture.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Full continuously variable Apeture priority with M lenses at 05/08/2005 - 21:38

George Lazarette
What is it you want to know?

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Manual for SMC Pentax-FA 28-80mm at 05/08/2005 - 00:23

George Lazarette
A few months ago, "Spirit of Will" posted here offering to obtain Pentax Limited lenses.

Recently he and I came to an agreement concerning a 31mm Ltd lens, and yesterday evening he delivered it.

It's a great lens; I'm happy with the price; and Will's a nice chap. If anybody else was thinking of dealing with him, I certainly have no complaints at all.

George

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Buying a Limited lens at 02/08/2005 - 23:05

George Lazarette
Kim,

Point taken.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Takumar-F versus SMC Pentax-F at 10/08/2005 - 08:29

George Lazarette
Kim,

Stan's site doesn't mention the non-SMC lenses in this range. The original poster said he couldn't see a difference between the SMC and non-SMC versions, hence my wondering if the non-SMC did in fact have an SMC coating.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Takumar-F versus SMC Pentax-F at 09/08/2005 - 23:12

George Lazarette
This is a very interesting situation.

Pentax appear to have produced four different lenses in the same housing, one of which (according to Boz) was the SMCP-F 70-210, which had a 13/9 configuration. The others were all non-SMC and 10/8, and two were 70-200.

Personally, I find this a bit surprising. Boz is not infallible, and it is possible that his information is wrong. I should have expected all of them to have had the same element/group construction.

It is instructive to recall the SP500. In order to attack a lower price point in the market, Pentax released a version of the SP1000 with a lower max shutter speed and at a lower price. However, instead of making a different camera, Pentax simply fitted a dial which didn't mark the 1/1000 speed.

Perhaps on the same principle your lens DOES have SMC, but was marketed as not having it!

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Takumar-F versus SMC Pentax-F at 02/08/2005 - 22:49

George Lazarette
The most significant difference is the absence of SMC coating.

Not only does this (SMC) reduce flare and ghosting when shooting into the light, but it also improves light transmission through the lens, which in turn improves contrast and colour. The effect is especially noticeable with zoom lenses, which tend to have a lot of elements, and therefore a lot of glass/air surfaces.

There are so many good SMC lenses available at very reasonable prices that there is absolutely no point in saddling yourself with a non-SMC lens. They should be simply thrown away.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Takumar-F versus SMC Pentax-F at 01/08/2005 - 23:22

George Lazarette
Take a look at the message above yours.

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Problem with my ZOOM 90 at 01/08/2005 - 11:42

George Lazarette
When I worked in far-away places (like Central Africa) I always made sure I had a few friends in the local Embassy/High Commision.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Printers??? at 01/08/2005 - 23:06

George Lazarette
Of course you have internet printers there. Use a UK one, and get them to post to you.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Printers??? at 31/07/2005 - 22:08

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo