George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Benji,

You have already posted this, on Thursday, under Pentax Film SLRs. We've all read it. And you replied to it earlier today.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on My Meeting With PENTAX...News at 05/05/2007 - 21:09

George Lazarette
Chris,

Just to be brutally frank, for a moment, I have to say that these pictures are not sharp enough to be worth spending too much more effort on.

Get the girl back, and shoot some more, making sure that your focus is correct (or are you using a Canon lens?).

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Some portraits for critique at 05/05/2007 - 15:43

George Lazarette
I have to say that JR's portrait is technically excellent, but perhaps therein is the reason why Daniel prefers Chris's efforts - they appear more natural and less posed. JR's does scream "STUDIO".

Nonetheless, I think JR's points are all valid. The secret Chris needs to learn is to capture the vitality of John's picture whilst retaining the simplicity of his.

A little theory and a bit more practice is required, methinks.

Keep 'em coming, Chris. There's lots of potential in your pictures. And the model is a sweetie. (As is John's.)

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Some portraits for critique at 05/05/2007 - 15:12

George Lazarette
I suggest you buy that camera. You will have endless fun with it, and it'll keep you out of mischief for months.

And there is no law, as far as I am aware, that says you are only allowed one zoom lens. If 16mm is too narrow for you, get a 12-24. Then a 24-90, perhaps, to give you a bit of length.

Both these lenses are easy enough to find, either new or second-hand (I've just sold a 24-90). Just keep a beady eye on Ebay.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on An apology and a 'goodbye'... at 04/05/2007 - 18:11

George Lazarette
Quote:
the prefix "just a" has definite negative connotations, implying that the camera isn't really any good because it's "just a loss leader".

This coupled with the OP's general attitude succeeded in getting peoples backs up. I was sorry to hear that he was suffering from depression and I wish him all the best wherever he has gone, but he did get on my nerves and my nerves are not usually easy to get on.
I concur with everything you said, though my nerves are perhaps a little easier to twang than yours.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is the K10D just a loss leader for Pentax? at 14/05/2007 - 17:47

George Lazarette
Quote:
Hi,

Matt: "Even the title "Just a loss leader" is asking for an argument"

I am not sure why you say this? the term 'loss leader' is a common retailing term and has been for years, it is not in the slightest bit derogatory..simply an item which is sold at a price which has a low mark-up (with no profit) for marketing reasons.

cheers Steve.
But he didn't say "loss leader". He said "just a loss leader", which changes the meaning considerably.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is the K10D just a loss leader for Pentax? at 14/05/2007 - 14:57

George Lazarette
Quote:


The thing about lenses is that we only buy a few, ..............
I'll keep quiet, I think.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is the K10D just a loss leader for Pentax? at 13/05/2007 - 18:55

George Lazarette
And don't overlook the 77mm. You can get them in excellent condition for around £400.00, and they are just superb. Much smaller than the 85mm, which is a bit of a beast.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is the K10D just a loss leader for Pentax? at 13/05/2007 - 17:54

George Lazarette
Quote:


a fast 120mm or 135mm would also be useful and is not currently offered by pentax.

also as far as this thread goes, which is about pentax's marketing strategy and product line, lenses that aren't currently available new can't really be considered as relevant. (although they may be to individuals)
Come, come. Non-current lenses may not be relevant to Viewfinder's argument, but they are certainly relevant to people who want to buy a lens rather than start a slanging match.

The Pentax-F and -FA 1:2.8 135mm is reasonably fast for this focal length, and readily available if you want to buy one.

(I should declare an interest here. I have one for sale!)

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is the K10D just a loss leader for Pentax? at 13/05/2007 - 17:51

George Lazarette
I do agree that in an ideal world there would be loads of fast, low-cost, primes sitting on the shelves waiting for you to buy them.

But the sad fact is that nowadays most people prefer not-so-fast zooms. Fast zooms are not just expensive, but big and heavy too.

So until Pentax starts selling cameras in the millions again, it is not going to produce lots of fast, low-cost, primes. The market just isn't there.

It does however, produce some wonderful, fast, not-so-low-cost primes which can be bought on Ebay at around half list price.

If you're quick, there's a lovely 1:2 35mm on Ebay at the moment. It's in top zustand, apparently.

Plus several 43s, a 77mm, an 85mm, and a 20mm 1:2.8.

Happy hunting.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is the K10D just a loss leader for Pentax? at 13/05/2007 - 17:40

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo