All Forum Comments
Comment by Ericf posted on K-5 Elecronic Level at 10/06/2011 - 16:32
Daniel has the answer.
SRGB color space produces names of IMGP
AdobeRGB has names -IGP
Thanks - just nice to know these little points.
SRGB color space produces names of IMGP
AdobeRGB has names -IGP
Thanks - just nice to know these little points.
Comment by Ericf posted on File names at 10/05/2007 - 23:24
Yes they open correctly. I have tried reformat of SD card - file names remain unchanged. Perhaps I should try a camers reset?
What first brought it to my attention was my RAW editor Silkypix. In "old" folders, it displays thumbnails of all images. In the most recent 2 folders, it does not display those images which are .tif. However, I can select tif images in the file display, and they correctly open!
If I use Pentax Photobrowser, all folders display correctly.
Quite odd!
What first brought it to my attention was my RAW editor Silkypix. In "old" folders, it displays thumbnails of all images. In the most recent 2 folders, it does not display those images which are .tif. However, I can select tif images in the file display, and they correctly open!
If I use Pentax Photobrowser, all folders display correctly.
Quite odd!
Comment by Ericf posted on File names at 10/05/2007 - 23:09
Re K10, and file names.
I have various file names, such as IMGP1234, -IGP1234, IGP1234.
There seems no logic to these, and I cannst see at what point the character sequence changes.
Has the charagter string become corrupted (should it always be IMGP), and if so, can it be reset?
I have various file names, such as IMGP1234, -IGP1234, IGP1234.
There seems no logic to these, and I cannst see at what point the character sequence changes.
Has the charagter string become corrupted (should it always be IMGP), and if so, can it be reset?
Comment by Ericf posted on File names at 10/05/2007 - 21:28


I also tried the option for automatic correction (of the horizon), and this appeared successfully to correct the tilt (I have only tried it once, and I suppose it could be that I just got it right in the first place)?
It seems a slight omission that there is not an electronic adjustment to set the level to a correct reading in the first place, which would then allow for camera-to-camera differences in manufacture.
Do others use the level, and do you find it useful / accurate?