All Forum Comments
sorry to hear that Stan, I hope that they get you restored to normal service as soon as possible
Comment by davem posted on Another pointless thread at 15/07/2013 - 20:22
This adapter works with the DA*300. As Dave says a manual tweak and then it focuses fast and efficiently
Dave
Dave
Comment by davem posted on SMC Pentax-F AF Adapter 1.7X - FA28 - 2.8 - FA50 - 1.4 at 13/07/2013 - 20:48
Phillp wrote:
Hello davem
If you want to scan your 110 films VEHO Company have 2 film scanners . Both are very good one scan into sd card and the other to your computer .
Good Luck
What is the difference between the two scans?Hello davem
If you want to scan your 110 films VEHO Company have 2 film scanners . Both are very good one scan into sd card and the other to your computer .
Good Luck
Comment by davem posted on pentax 110 at 12/07/2013 - 09:35
The Gannets are they raising late broods until the beginning of September
Comment by davem posted on Short notice at 11/07/2013 - 22:24
JAK wrote:
Dave, you can clearly determine by the costumes that it is a very old film indeed. The figures look to be, at a guess, Victorian, and the statue probably photographed by Howard Carter on his trips to Egypt!
I'd say the prints are on par with others I've seen published on the web.
John K
This was the sort of look I wanted but perhaps a slightly better quality. Dave, you can clearly determine by the costumes that it is a very old film indeed. The figures look to be, at a guess, Victorian, and the statue probably photographed by Howard Carter on his trips to Egypt!
I'd say the prints are on par with others I've seen published on the web.
John K
HG the film was processed by www.PhotoFilmProcessing.co.uk who are also known as Fuji Digital Imaging Service - Standish Street - Burnley
Dave
Comment by davem posted on pentax 110 at 08/07/2013 - 21:31
Re the tab - it does all get confusing with the different advice available!
Here are a couple of the scanned images that were done when the film was processed by the lab.
Dave
Here are a couple of the scanned images that were done when the film was processed by the lab.
Dave
Comment by davem posted on pentax 110 at 05/07/2013 - 09:08
Thanks for all the help so far.
John the speeds are the other way around according to this site. link
Which is why I left the tab on.
Dave
John the speeds are the other way around according to this site. link
Which is why I left the tab on.
Dave
Comment by davem posted on pentax 110 at 04/07/2013 - 23:00
Here we see Woody taking Gartmore through his paces on the Pentax Q obstacle course last weekend on Ilkley Moor
[IMG]http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb316/davem_08/0bd2fb6e-6d30-4f7b-b82c-889269934ab0.jpg[/IMG]" class="comment_image" />
Great day out
Dave
[IMG]http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb316/davem_08/0bd2fb6e-6d30-4f7b-b82c-889269934ab0.jpg[/IMG]" class="comment_image" />Great day out
Dave
Comment by davem posted on Pentax User team in training at 04/07/2013 - 21:55
I was using the 24mm lens.
I will look at the photos later.
Dave
I will look at the photos later.
Dave
Comment by davem posted on pentax 110 at 04/07/2013 - 08:36
Sorry George and John In my rush to get the answers I did not give you all the information.
This is new film from Lomography.
The prints are very dark with little contrast. Some are grainy. They are appear in focus. In some ways they look like early Victorian prints.
The negs have been printed as 6"x4". The scans were low resolution and they seem worse.
Dave
This is new film from Lomography.
The prints are very dark with little contrast. Some are grainy. They are appear in focus. In some ways they look like early Victorian prints.
The negs have been printed as 6"x4". The scans were low resolution and they seem worse.
Dave
Comment by davem posted on pentax 110 at 03/07/2013 - 22:27
