All Forum Comments
Comment by DanielH posted on RAW processing at 29/11/2012 - 22:07
Interesting comment about under exposure I will take a look at the histograms tomorrow......
Comment by DanielH posted on 2nd Paid Wedding at 29/11/2012 - 21:55
Comment by DanielH posted on RAW processing at 29/11/2012 - 20:29
I wasn't really offended more interested to know what your POV was
Kind regards
Daniel.
Comment by DanielH posted on RAW processing at 29/11/2012 - 17:23
Daniel.
Comment by DanielH posted on 2nd Paid Wedding at 29/11/2012 - 17:12
Comment by DanielH posted on 2nd Paid Wedding at 29/11/2012 - 17:08
Comment by DanielH posted on 2nd Paid Wedding at 29/11/2012 - 13:38
Now I need YOUR help. I am sure that I can still improve things so please let me have it both barrels! as long as its constructive Many thanks in advance, and also thanks to all on here who have helped and put up with me so far
In your debt, Daniel.











Comment by DanielH posted on 2nd Paid Wedding at 29/11/2012 - 13:15
I shot a very enjoyable wedding next to a friend of the brides, who I hadnt met before and had just borrowed a DSLR from another friend. We chatted about photography and got to know each other at the reception and i shared a little of my(albeit)limited knowledge
Daniel
Comment by DanielH posted on Wedding Photographer Shuts Down Business at 29/11/2012 - 12:26
Explain please
I'm only "prodding" him to see if that IS actually his view?
Comment by DanielH posted on RAW processing at 29/11/2012 - 12:17


I'm only "prodding" him to see if that IS actually his view?
I won't be drawn into the 'what's best' debate of JPG v RAW except to say that what's best is what suits and pleases the individual.
I shoot RAW because I don't have much time to play the 'old school' photographer to achieve perfectly framed and exposed shots in-camera.
I value the adjustment latitude afforded to me by shooting RAW that JPG choose not to benefit from, because I don't always (rarely in fact) get it right first time.
I crop almost all of my images as well as making other adjustments and it's a well documented fact that when you shoot JPG, make adjustments of any kind, then save the file, the initial JPG that was already missing a huge amount of image information, is degraded even further.
Bottom line is, why spend £1500 - £2000 on a camera body and decent lens, but balk at the thought of spending another £100 on decent RAW editing software. It doesn't make sense to me.
Hope i explained myself second time around
Daniel