All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on “Other” lenses with K100D at 05/04/2010 - 09:59
Comment by Dangermouse posted on pentax sfx 35mm film camera at 05/04/2010 - 09:52
Comment by Dangermouse posted on SMC Pentax 120mm f2.8 at 04/04/2010 - 22:20
Still looking for the attachment (closeup) lens although I do not rate my chances of finding one in similarly mint condition.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on My three Exes at 04/04/2010 - 19:00
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/IMGP2047.jpg[/IMG]
Which came to me with some paint scuffs but perfect optics for £65. It's now in the gear bag due to being faster than the M 135mm f3.5. A comparative shot of the two:
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/IMGP2050.jpg[/IMG]
I've since sourced the correct "crinkle" finish lens cap for the K series, just makes it easier to identify at a glance (and I like the original pattern).
So, enough photos of the lens, how about a couple of tests with the lens?
I'm currently recovering from an obnoxious variety of flu, so haven't been able to get out of the house much. This gardenia is currently next to the kitchen sink:
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/IMGP2052.jpg[/IMG]
The garden wall:
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/IMGP2053.jpg[/IMG]
A holly bush:
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/IMGP2055.jpg[/IMG]
Wonky focus (as on 1 and 3) should be sorted when my new split focussing screen turns up. Otherwise, I think it's a great lens performing in much the same way as any other K series. The colour reproduction tends towards natural shades instead of artificial vibrancy and it seems pretty sharp at all apertures. If you ever see one, buy it. A keeper!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on SMC Pentax 120mm f2.8 at 04/04/2010 - 17:03
Incidentally, if you don't have the original clip-on lens hood then I think there's an ebay seller in Canada who had a handful. I bought one for my 85-210mm f4.5 (same hood, also fits 200mm f4) from them.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on My three Exes at 04/04/2010 - 16:46
A very odd piece of kit, I think I ran about two rolls of film through it before getting bored and going back to 35mm. Even my K1000 had a built in light meter, after all...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on S-M-C Takumar 28mm f/3.5 at 03/04/2010 - 21:26
putting a 40mm on an MG?
Comment by Dangermouse posted on nice photographs of old cameras at 03/04/2010 - 21:09
hehe.
Not a chance . This was all packed by my ever helpful Mother-in-law when her friends didn't have room - it was " Oh there's room in my attic " and it got stuffed full. I hate the pull down ladder so wait for the kids coming up to do it for me You would be surprised at the tatty old rubbish furniture she stored up there - none is valuable , charities won't take it - so it's going in the skip [ at the end of May now ] My husband kept muttering that we would have to deal with the attic - but kept adding to it
Now the time has come
Sorry - even Leffe's not a good enough bribe
Autoglass eventually arrived at 3pm, windscreen now replaced. If I feel better tomorrow I might try going out to take some photos.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 03/04/2010 - 17:16
Of course, it wasn't raining during the hours they were originally booked to come. Just have to hope the weather holds!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 03/04/2010 - 14:03


I think your best bet is to take the lens off, inspect the AF drive, and assuming it appears ok then try remounting the kit lens and then flicking from AF to MF and back. If none of these solve it then I think you're looking at a Pentax Service job.