All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on 50-135 vs 60-250 at 28/08/2011 - 22:26
I'm very happy with the lens, about the only complaint is that the SDM takes its time. It will lock onto a subject in very low light without hunting, but takes a while to actually turn the mechanism.
I did use it at Goodwood FoS, where I found that I needed to prefocus and shoot at around f5.6 or so to get sharp images. The lens is sharp from f2.8 on but greater depth of field helped to get moving subjects properly focussed.
It is of course WR sealed, and I can see myself buying a K20D or K7 when prices come down a bit. K20Ds in particular should start turning up on the used market more frequently as K7s trickle down to backup body status with K5s finding more new owners.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Sigma 70-200 f2.8 or Tamron 70-200 f2.8 or Pentax 60-250 f4 at 28/08/2011 - 22:20
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Flash Unit for SP 1000 at 28/08/2011 - 20:31
The lack of AF on these lenses isn't much of a problem. I know I tend to leave mine set to infinity and f8, at which point anything at a sensible distance is in focus.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Pentax-Takumar-SMC-f3-5-28mm-WIDE-ANGLE-/360389767030?... has been wrongly listed but the photo is the M series 28mm I was on about, it's seriously sharp. I'd be a bit wary of that particular example as it comes with a hard lens case, which seem prone to keeping damp in and allowing fungus to take hold in my experience.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Camera repairs - London at 28/08/2011 - 20:24
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 28/08/2011 - 17:01
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 27/08/2011 - 23:15
I fell down part of the Claerwen valley today and now my left ankle doesn't work properly. Don't think it's broken or dislocated as I can walk on it and it bends ok, just very sore!
Luckily I had an ME Super in my hand worth about £20 rather than anything more desirable. It seems unaffected. I very nearly took my best MX and am rather glad I didn't.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 27/08/2011 - 22:55
My advice: Get an older MF 28mm prime to complete your kit rather than a 28-80mm. Look up either of the Pentax 28mm f3.5 variants or if you want a single lens then look for the Pentax-M or Pentax-A 35-70mm. The M version is slightly faster but will only work in manual mode on your camera (suits me fine, others will vary!) The A version has the contacts and aperture ring setting for program mode.
Bear in mind that older primes are easier to use on digital than zooms as you can just set the focal length for SR and leave it. The 28mm makes a very handy walkabout lens on digital - I used an old SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 as a standard lens (smaller than the kit zoom) until I had the DA 35mm f2.4.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Camera repairs - London at 27/08/2011 - 22:45
TTL mode won't work, but you'll get Program Flash if you set the flash to one of the two auto modes and the camera to P. This flash also has variable power in manual mode and takes up very little space.
Bonus: It'll work fully with all the other bodies in your sig!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Can any one recomend a small flash unit? at 25/08/2011 - 17:57
They are, unfortunately, rather hard to find...
I would recommend the M 135mm f3.5 to anyone wanting something faster than the kit lenses on a tight budget. It's tiny, well made, and sharp. You may struggle with moving subjects or sudden changes in brightness however.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on The Best Value Pentax Lens? at 23/08/2011 - 22:25

