Dangermouse

Joined: 25th November 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Dangermouse
Personally I've used white vinegar or normal optical cleaning spray successfully to remove fungus, just dunk a cotton bud in either and swab the fungus away.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on Fungus in lenses at 10/09/2010 - 12:43

Dangermouse
I keep meaning to try that technique after reading that this is why very early street photos have no visible people in them (as the shutter speed was too slow to catch them, unless they stood still for ages).

I think it could be quite a good one if you could obtain a few ND filters and get onto a balcony or rooftop overlooking a normally busy street. Set the tripod up and use extreme NDs to allow a 30 second exposure.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on New York Sleeps at 10/09/2010 - 12:40

Dangermouse
I've never been entirely sure how far away infinity should be anyway - I recently spent some time trying to get an old K 28-50mm adjusted by the simple approach of attaching it to my Super A (which has a split focus screen), putting it on a tripod, then lining up on a ridge line which I would guess to be about five or six miles distant. Hopefully that was far enough!

Comment by Dangermouse posted on Infinity (and beyond) at 10/09/2010 - 11:05

Dangermouse
I'm given to understand that there is free software which will convert ebook formats into each other. I would want to grab some out-of-copyright stuff from Project Gutenberg and similar sources so the ability to add content which wasn't bought from Amazon would be handy.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 09/09/2010 - 23:29

Dangermouse
I've been intrigued by the Kindle promising "free 3G for life" and "free 3G web browsing". There must be a catch somewhere but I can't find it, unless it's the obvious one that browsing with it will be limited.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 09/09/2010 - 22:42

Dangermouse
I have the exact opposite problem - all M42 lenses underexpose horribly on my K-m with a genuine Pentax adapter. I could use a handheld meter but to be honest why bother? I'll just stick to K or M series glass for my vintage lens fix as that works perfectly with stop-down metering. Prices are much the same as Takumars and in any case the K series are effectively SMC Taks with a K mount.


Back to the topic, I expect my camera bag to be somewhat lighter after the 35mm arrives as I won't be lugging the A 50mm f1.7 or the K 28mm f3.5 about. Neither will be going anywhere however - the 50mm is going onto my Super A while the 28mm will be in my pocket when I'm out with my KX or KM.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on DA-L 35mm f2.4 announced at 09/09/2010 - 22:18

Dangermouse
gartmore wrote:
Dangermouse wrote:
I have a Super Tak 35mm f3.5 but have never managed to get it to work on digital. Photos are invariably seriously under-exposed regardless of what settings I use, which doesn't happen with K mount lenses. Must sort my ES II out and give it a go on that.
Too late in the evening to give this serious thought but its perhaps to do with the Super Takumar being designed for stop down metering whereas the later SMC Takumars have the auto/man switch for the later cameras' open aperture metering. Put me right Hefty1.
Nope, I have an SMC Tak 135mm f3.5 and that doesn't work either!

As soon as I work out why my ES II's light meter occasionally cuts out for no reason (but comes back if you wiggle the stop down switch and half press the shutter) I will be putting a roll of film in and using both.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on DA-L 35mm f2.4 announced at 09/09/2010 - 21:28

Dangermouse
I have a Super Tak 35mm f3.5 but have never managed to get it to work on digital. Photos are invariably seriously under-exposed regardless of what settings I use, which doesn't happen with K mount lenses. Must sort my ES II out and give it a go on that.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on DA-L 35mm f2.4 announced at 09/09/2010 - 20:54

Dangermouse
I wouldn't try opening a long zoom up. However, there are people who can strip and clean lenses. It may be worth asking for a quote from a repairer.

I did manage to clean out a K 28-50mm but that was a bit of a pain, especially when it came to re-setting the infinity position on the focus mechanism.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on Lens mould at 09/09/2010 - 20:49

Dangermouse
And to think I just start at the front and keep going until I finish reading!

Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 09/09/2010 - 20:02

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo