All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Boots Slide Film- Do they still process it? at 06/10/2010 - 14:18
It really isn't hard. I accept that some people have trouble with spelling but there are free spellcheck facilities available. If you use Firefox it has a plugin to check spelling as you type, although mine seems to be stuck on American rather than proper English. If you're asking people to buy something from you the least you can do is to spell the listing properly!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 06/10/2010 - 14:14
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 05/10/2010 - 22:35
I've become slightly addicted to ITV4's repeats of The Professionals, The Champions, Randall and Hopkirk, and The Prisoner. All had left the screen before I was born so I never got to see them the first time around.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 05/10/2010 - 21:51
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 05/10/2010 - 21:44
As I'm using an Agfa Rondinax tank I only need 200ml of each chemical at a time, so keeping large volumes of them made up won't work.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Home developing - ideas? at 05/10/2010 - 21:11
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Tamron 18 / 200 at 05/10/2010 - 20:36
This was of course in the days when you were still allowed to do your own wiring (circa 1994 at a guess)...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 05/10/2010 - 19:46
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Opteka 500mm f/6.3 Telephoto Mirror; at 04/10/2010 - 10:36
The field of view of that 43mm Ltd when fitted to a DSLR would be similar to that of a 65mm lens on film. Most people seem to want around the 50mm/55mm mark as a portrait lens on digital, although it depends on the portrait you want.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on ltd lenses at 04/10/2010 - 10:34


The address is still correct, the problem is jobsworths at the Post Office. If you simply put a 1st class stamp on (as you always used to) then despite the item being under the weight limit and able to fit through a letterbox it will be summarily rejected and lost to the depths of the postal system (I can't bring myself to call it a service!) because it's more than 5mm thick. You need to use 1st class packet post instead - £1.30 to send a roll today!
I shall wait to see whether this one reappears before using any more.