All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on I'm kind of new to this. at 10/11/2010 - 01:03
Comment by Dangermouse posted on going to japan! advice? at 10/11/2010 - 00:15
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Expanding web presence for documentary photography with flickr? at 10/11/2010 - 00:02
It settled after a bit of wagging, I know I'd turned traction control off at the time but don't know whether ESP is even fitted to 2006 Saab 9-3 TiDs.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 09/11/2010 - 23:47
That's an odd experience with the Kangoo. I learned to drive in a Citroen ZX 1.9D with cheap tyres and it'd go pretty much anywhere providing the snow wasn't too deep, it probably had a similar power output, wheelbase and weight. No ABS, traction control, or stability assist so you learned to spot wheelspin pretty quickly.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 09/11/2010 - 22:33
I'd still like one, but I'd prefer the K version for my KX...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on going to japan! advice? at 09/11/2010 - 22:13
Comment by Dangermouse posted on going to japan! advice? at 09/11/2010 - 20:43
Now I actively look for the slippery stuff, working the car on the loud pedal, finding the limits of grip, allowing slides and learning all the time. ESP off is even more fun but a lot of work.
Should get word back in the next couple of days about my track design for the two day session on a frozen lake in Feb.
Bret
I find snowchains/studs an interesting idea. See, I used to have BF Goodrich A/Ts which despite the name were brilliant on tarmac as well as on gravel, rocks, and less gloopy mud. Those, when new, made driving on snow just like driving on dry tarmac. You had steering and brakes and it'd go up anything, even the little concrete ramps into car parks which had normal cars slipping to a halt. I can't really see that snowchains or studded tyres would have been much of an improvement!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 09/11/2010 - 18:01
As I said before, my only successful fix on a modern (ish) lens was an 80-200mm zoom. I was lucky in that the mould was only on the very front element which could be unscrewed without much hassle and was fairly easy to adjust once refitted.
I'd previously bought a "spares or repair" 28-80mm with power zoom - let's just say I now have a selection of optical glass lenses and lumps of plastic as there were too many broken bits for me to figure out how to rebuild it! On the plus side its power zoom switch has been passed to an otherwise perfect example of the same lens.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Fun with Fungus.! at 09/11/2010 - 15:25
Older lenses are easier to work on as in general the parts will drop into the correct alignment and then stay there while you tighten things a little more than finger tight. I've only fiddled with one AF lens (F 80-200mm f4.7-5.6) which had a bit of mould on the back of the front element. Luckily this part simply unscrewed from the filter thread and was easy to clean, I then had some fun resetting the infinity focus (you screw the front element in or out and then tighten a collar against it to lock it in place) but it seems to work perfectly.
Try not to disturb the infinity setting while regreasing - if you can get at the thread without doing this then it will save a lot of hassle later on. The best way I've found to set infinity focus if you do have to disturb that is to use a film body with split focus screen, mounted on a tripod and aimed at the furthest point you can find (I use a ridge about six or seven miles away). You can then tweak it until perfect.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Fun with Fungus.! at 08/11/2010 - 22:39

