All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Postage - How Much!!! at 24/01/2011 - 17:18
Comment by Dangermouse posted on camerapricebuster.co.uk at 23/01/2011 - 22:33
There was also the 40mm f2.8 "pancake" lens, which wasn't especially expensive at the time but is now rather sought-after due to its tiny size and pleasing field of view. I use one on a black ME Super as a pocket camera, as the lens is only about 3cm long!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on A black ME at 23/01/2011 - 18:18
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax ME Super + M50 f1.4 + M135 f3.5 MINT? at 23/01/2011 - 18:13
Comment by Dangermouse posted on A black ME at 23/01/2011 - 16:27
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/IMGP4752.jpg[/IMG]
The camera and lens are in almost perfect condition, the lens is probably the nicest example of the M 50/1.7 I own with a very light, smooth focus and no dust inside. The ERC has suffered a bit but is still presentable, so it'll be living in that to keep it minty. I've just loaded a roll of HP5 and will be giving it a careful test over the next few weeks.
How do I know the manual is original? It still has the slip of paper inside with the camera serial number (which matches that on the body)!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on A black ME at 23/01/2011 - 15:00
If you buy a matching flash (the AF160 and AF200S would both work, aren't expensive, and are from the same era as the camera) then the camera will automatically switch to 1/125 and display a "flash ready" LED in the viewfinder when the flash is charged.
As for film I use Ilford HP5 for B&W and Boots slide film for colour, as both are readily available and easy to organise processing for (the slide film comes with an envelope to send it off, I can process the HP5 at home). If you look in my thread about the MV1 you'll find an album of photos taken in the last couple of weeks using HP5, to give an idea of how it behaves.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax ME Super + M50 f1.4 + M135 f3.5 MINT? at 23/01/2011 - 14:54
Posted a link as I haven't resized them!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on In praise of the humble MV1 at 23/01/2011 - 14:30
I see a lot of people using the word "minty", which I take as meaning "It's close to mint, but I won't use that word because someone will moan about a tiny mark on the base".
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax ME Super + M50 f1.4 + M135 f3.5 MINT? at 23/01/2011 - 14:27
Compare the metering to another body and if it seems on the money then definitely put a film through it. Even if you still decide to sell (and I doubt you will - the click of an ME Super shutter is a very pleasant sound) you'll then be able to legitimately list the body as film tested and put a couple of links in to sample images.
I for one am very cautious about buying ME Supers now as they seem to be some of the worst for being sold as "good condition" and then turning out not to work (got two working ones and three broken!) Being able to provide proof that this one works properly should bump the price up a bit.
Yes the ME Super has an electronic shutter, you need two LR44s to get it working. I would avoid anything with "lomography" on the box personally as that approach to photography seems to make a virtue of seriously rough-looking images! Boots still sell process-paid slide film which I find very good indeed, just make sure you put the right postage on the return envelope as a stamp is no longer acceptable by the post office.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax ME Super + M50 f1.4 + M135 f3.5 MINT? at 23/01/2011 - 00:05

