All Forum Comments
Comment by Clarky posted on 300mm DA macro at 12/07/2009 - 12:06
Comment by Clarky posted on Pentax DA 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 AL WR at 12/07/2009 - 12:00
Would this have to be the most inspiring E-bay listing you have ever seen
Comment by Clarky posted on Pentax DA 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 AL WR at 12/07/2009 - 11:52
I don't believe shooting 200 ISO will give you noise issues.
This was shot at 400iso with on board flash, and I don't see any noise. unless I am missing something ?
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0032.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Clarky posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 11:24
I took these hand held with off camera flash (Metz 58 AF-1) on a bracket, i'm just wondering if the new Lumiquest softbox I used for the first time may have something to with the lack of crispness. I know from experience that some diffusers (especially with macro) can give a misty appearence in your shots. I'll do a comparison with my Stofen diffuser.
I need to experiment a little more before giving the camera the thumbs down. cheers
Comment by Clarky posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 11:01
I wouldn't blame the camera just yet though, its probably me more than anything.
When you say they are not up too scratch, are we talking about the rendering, composition, subject matter, Please elaborate
Thanks for the comments
Comment by Clarky posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 10:33
Hi Clarky,
Sorry to say this, but Nr.1 and Nr.3 look totally unacceptable for ISO 200 shots. At first I thought you wrote down 13200 ISO. But PhotoMe confirms ISO 200.What happened here??
Martin.
Love the images Clarky, but would just like Martin said I would have expected less noise on those images at 200
Like Martin I also noticed that noise and would really like to know if the K7 is better at noise control than the K20. This is one of the features that would help me decide if I am getting a K7 or not, of course among some other few ones that I already like. But I have been a bit disappointed with the noise control of the K20 and was hoping that the K7 would be a huge leap in improvement.
What do you new K7 owners think so far about the noise?
I'm quite happy with everything at the moment and still working through all the kinks, just need to find some time and some good weather
Comment by Clarky posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 08:45
1 and 3 were cropped a bit more than the others and I suspect it was my sharpening efforts that are to blame was a little rushed
These are the unprocessed versions
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0119-1.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0128-1.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Clarky posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 08:35
All taken at f11/13 200iso minimal processing
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0119.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0127.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0128.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0124.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0121.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/IMGP0118.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Clarky posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 07:24
Comment by Clarky posted on Pentax smc DA 40mm f/2.8 Limited at 11/07/2009 - 15:45


Got all excited for a second, from the title I thought Pentax had released a DA* 300mm f4 macro lens overnight without me knowing.
Not an easy thing to do, to achieve perfect focus with that lens, pretty good effort but as Pete says, a little under exposed.