Clarky

Joined: 19th July 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Clarky
Quote:
Congratulations to both fathers of the brides.
I can't help with a photographer I'm afraid - unless petekd fancies a day out in (New) South Wales

I did the photography for my eldest son's wedding. I vowed never to do another wedding after that!
Your not planning a holiday too Aust in late April 2009 are you

Comment by Clarky posted on wedding photographer needed at 18/02/2008 - 22:07

Clarky
Quote:
hello peeps, my daughter has name the day, march 2009. is there anyone here from the south wales area who is an experienced wedding photographer?

Or can you recommend someone who is?

many thanks.
If you wern't giving the bride away i would have recommended you

My daughters having her big day in late April 2009.
Are you getting nagged yet

Comment by Clarky posted on wedding photographer needed at 18/02/2008 - 20:42

Clarky
Quote:
Is there somewhere I can download a focus test chart?

I think I've seen it somewhere on the forum in the past, but I can't find it!
Here is the test chart Gordon, you can thank ChrisA for it.

Sorry Gordon forgot to add the link

http://focustestchart.com/chart.html

Comment by Clarky posted on Backfocus tests at 18/02/2008 - 20:29

Clarky
I was suspecting some backfocus with my K10 and decided to run a few tests.
It appears ok in this respect but maybe its front focusing a little.
Am i reading it correctly. Thanks

90mm tamron macro
Comment Image

Comment Image

Shutter @ 1/125
Aperture f2.5
iso 200

I also performed a few tests on my DA* 16-50 @50mm
Comment Image

Shutter @ 1/60
Aperture f2.8
iso 100

I also took this shot with the 90mm macro. I set the battery up 50mm in front of the box with the print on it. and shot it from 1metre away.
Comment Image

Comment by Clarky posted on Backfocus tests at 18/02/2008 - 01:37

Clarky
Quote:
Thank you for the comments.

I am just trying to decide, if the piggy bank ever fills up again, whether to replace the lens with a modern equivalent.

I do not know if a new version of this lens would be optically better as well as having the benefits of autofocus etc.
If the auto focus isn't a concern i would stick with the old Sigma. The shots you got look fine .
With my old peepers i need the AF nowadays. But as you are probably aware the latest Tamron and Sigma 70-300s are very cheap.

Comment by Clarky posted on 'Ancient' Sigma Photos - Comments ? at 18/02/2008 - 21:06

Clarky
I like 4a and 1b for me. Nice shots AJ

Comment by Clarky posted on opinions please at 17/02/2008 - 21:01

Clarky
Quote:
It looks like an earlyish Sigma lens to me due to the style of typeface used for the barrel markings. I doubt it's a macro lens as it seems to only focus down to 0.3m - unless the distance scale extends further than we can see. The 'lock'/'unlock' ring makes the bottom of the lens look like an uncommon example of a Sigma 'Adaptall' style mount. Is it listed as a Pentax mount lens?

Batty
Yes the listing says it came off a Pentax P30

Comment by Clarky posted on Mystery Lens?? at 17/02/2008 - 20:21

Clarky
Can anyone identify this lens ??

Comment Image


Its listed on E-Bay as a Hoya HMC 52mm, obviously thats the filter, just not sure what lens it is or even if its a Pentax.
I suspect it may be a 50mm macro??

Comment by Clarky posted on Mystery Lens?? at 17/02/2008 - 12:47

Clarky
I think they look great. You certainly turn out some good B&W shots. Keep it up.
BTW i think the lens is a 10-20 not a 20-20

Comment by Clarky posted on Sigma 10-20 & mono at 17/02/2008 - 12:29

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo