All Forum Comments
robbie_d wrote:
link
I could be wrong though.
You are correct Rob, thats the one that has been discontinued I believe. I don't think they have announced a replacement as yet.Clarky wrote:
I wasn't aware the HSM version had been released in the Pentax mount, I had the non HSM version (now discontinued) and its a stellar lens, a little on the heavy side but optically its excellent.
It would appear from the website that although on the lens selection screen under Pentax mount it lists it as HSM, when you get into the lens page it specifies the non-HSM version in a Pentax mount.I wasn't aware the HSM version had been released in the Pentax mount, I had the non HSM version (now discontinued) and its a stellar lens, a little on the heavy side but optically its excellent.
link
I could be wrong though.
Comment by Clarky posted on 180mm f/3.5 EX DG HSM at 01/07/2010 - 14:18
I wasn't aware the HSM version had been released in the Pentax mount, I had the non HSM version (now discontinued) and its a stellar lens, a little on the heavy side but optically its excellent.
Comment by Clarky posted on 180mm f/3.5 EX DG HSM at 01/07/2010 - 12:27
Mike are you reviewing your pics more when using the macro.
Constantly using the LCD screen will run your battery down. I do it all the time, zooming in and out, checking the Histogram, comparing pics all play a part.
Constantly using the LCD screen will run your battery down. I do it all the time, zooming in and out, checking the Histogram, comparing pics all play a part.
Comment by Clarky posted on Battery drain at 25/06/2010 - 10:13
Pet Pics inc.
dougf8 wrote:
pussypics and doggystyles
, would you put that on a business card. pussypics and doggystyles
Comment by Clarky posted on What's a good name for a pet photography business? at 19/06/2010 - 06:20
Good luck in your endeavours, I hope it all goes well for you.
Comment by Clarky posted on Farewell... kind of. at 12/06/2010 - 23:40
£200 on the paint and the rest was labour costs
You wacky Brits
You wacky Brits
Comment by Clarky posted on Some kind of record? at 11/06/2010 - 17:01
gartmore wrote:
The chequered area means you shouldn't enter it unless you can get out the other end, unless you are turning right. A scene you seldom see!
ahhh I see it now, lol its cute. If they ever bring the Tour de France into your neck of the woods perhaps they could incorporate that little stretch into the race, now that would be a sight too see Clarky wrote:
So how does it work Ken,: when a cyclist is in the chequered area does the traffic have to give way to them :
I think you are mistaken Stefan, we are on the right side and you are on the wrong side
That would be great! No, the cycle lane is supposed to protect cyclists and it is the little red area at the top left corner of the chequered area, it has a crashed bike painted on it.So how does it work Ken,: when a cyclist is in the chequered area does the traffic have to give way to them :
I think you are mistaken Stefan, we are on the right side and you are on the wrong side
The chequered area means you shouldn't enter it unless you can get out the other end, unless you are turning right. A scene you seldom see!
Comment by Clarky posted on Some kind of record? at 11/06/2010 - 16:23
I found Qantas to be rather flexible, I have used them a number of times and as long as the bag is dimensionally correct they let it through, I have carried 11kgs into the cabin without any problems.
Qantas and Virgin are also quite good if you are flying domestically but avoid Jetstar and Tiger, they are Nazi's when it comes to luggage weight.
Where abouts are travelling in Aust?? If I can help you help you out with anything let me know. cheers