All Forum Comments
Comment by ChrisA posted on Recent K-5 Review claims camera hampered by... at 19/05/2012 - 19:38
The most prevelent negative commit I saw was there's no instant video recording button. I guess moving the mode dial to movie is too difficult or time consuming.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Recent K-5 Review claims camera hampered by... at 19/05/2012 - 19:33
Got my K5 last Saturday from the great guys at Carmarthen camera (if your on holiday in west Wales call in its a gold mine).
Comment by ChrisA posted on Is now a good time to upgrade to a K-5? at 19/05/2012 - 18:25
I'm looking at a second charger for my K5 batteries. The original Pentax charger has three terminals marked, "- T +". The aftermarket versions seem to omit the "T" but say they will operate fine without. Can anybody tell me what the "T" terminal is for?
It allows monitoring of the temperature of the battery during charging.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Buying a spare battery at 19/05/2012 - 13:11
Now the film is still sitting in the MX 1/3used and as I couldn't view them when I got home, I now cant be bothered to have it developed.
I can imagine that if you have the time and the space to develop and print yourself, it can be an enjoyable experience, but otherwise, meh!
I should probably give my ME Super to someone that would use it...
Comment by ChrisA posted on I'm sulking at 19/05/2012 - 09:08
My view on the fee is that the site doesn't run itself for free
On the other hand, I know exactly how much it costs to run a dedicated server, with plenty of disk space, and tons of available bandwidth, and it isn't all that much.
Mine (well, my company's) costs about 1500 quid a year to run it and its backup. The hardware cost of each server was about 800 quid. We pay extra for software of various kinds, but PHPBB and vBulletin both run on MySQL which is free.
The only issue would be with the gallery images. I'm not sure how much space they take up, but if it's of the order of a few TB, it wouldn't be that big a deal.
So given that the moderators work unpaid, as I understand it, I don't think the forum itself needs to be all that expensive, and plenty of other such, run perfectly well on donations.
So I take the point about public-spiritedness being an incentive to subscribe, but it's their choice to run it the way they do.
And it's not as if paying for it - or part of it - gets us any influence of any kind. A lot of the stuff in the Forum T&Cs stem directly from the fact that it's a business, with specific business interests behind it - that don't necessarily coincide with the sort of things that the community likes to talk about sometimes.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Pentax User plus membership at 18/05/2012 - 14:25
Then I joined PUP, sent in the lens on their proper form with my membership number, and guess what they quoted?
Yes, £120 including VAT, and the discount. There were no parts required - it was just an AF adjustment.
Obviously, without having sent the lens in and got a written quote from them *before* quoting them my membership number (which following their procedures in fact precludes), I haven't a leg to stand on.
My bad, but I still feel conned.
The additional content isn't enough for me to feel it's worth paying for, I'm afraid.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Pentax User plus membership at 18/05/2012 - 08:47
Also take a look at Sigma Lenses. They are just as good as Pentax lenses
And they turn the wrong way.
I'd say the colours render a little cooler on both of them than on my Pentax lenses.
It's not a huge effect, and I do find it surprising that it's even noticeable. The lenses are supposed to be transparent, after all
Comment by ChrisA posted on One "all-in-one" lens for beginner at 17/05/2012 - 22:16
I don't want to unfairly malign the website so I'm not going to mention them (especially since I suspect I'm worrying over nothing) but it is one of the online suppliers named on the Pentax UK website.
I'm not alarmed in any way, and the camera seems fine, but, not knowing what to expect, I just wanted to make sure.
However, SRS has a fantastic reputation here for excellent service. You can be 100% sure they will not have ripped you off in any way.
And if they did make a mistake, you'll find them excellent at sorting it out.
I've dealt with them for years, as have many here, and they are superb. I wouldn't buy camera gear from anywhere else except in very unusual circumstances.
I bought my K-5 and several of my lenses from them. There have been a couple of issues, but the service when they sorted them out was excellent.
Be fully confident in them - ask for Chris at the Watford branch in person if necessary, he owns it. He's Chris@SRSWatford here.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Testing a new camera and lens - what to look for? at 16/05/2012 - 16:40
I agree. We can spend hours discussing optics, focus breathing, equivalent AOV and a million other things that really don't matter.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Lenses and focal leangth. at 16/05/2012 - 12:26


"If an image is more than 1.5 percent noise it is considered to be overly grainy." - Who says?
And - as if the amount of noise is even constant from shot to shot - it's heavily dependent on the exposure.
I've noticed that PC magazines tend to be rubbish at camera reviews. For instance, I've mostly found PC Pro are pretty reliable for computer reviews, but noticed that they talk a lot of complete crap when it comes to cameras, especially dSLRs.
So not entirely surprising that PCMag would trot out a lot of ill-informed cobblers.