All Forum Comments
Comment by ChrisA posted on Some portraits with my ME Super at 19/09/2011 - 18:23
Comment by ChrisA posted on Wanted: Modest flash wanted for K-r, with tilt and (idealy) swivel at 19/09/2011 - 18:14
Comment by ChrisA posted on Some portraits with my ME Super at 19/09/2011 - 17:51
Before making her choice it maight be as well to ensure she handles each of the cameras, Chris. The size and layout of controls on the K5 might suit her. This is highly subjective, but I know that Canons always feel "fat" in my hands (I can't explain why this is so or what I mean, rationally, but it's all about "feel"). Top quality Nikons are nicer to hold but nothing feels like my K10. Nothing.
FWIW, this is what I've emailed her:
[quote="I"]I don’t think it’s entirely obvious that Canon is inevitably the best just because you have a few old Canon lenses, though I wouldn’t rule it out. Nor would I dream of suggesting Pentax just because I have one.
I think you should go into Jessops and handle a few – see how they strike you for weight, size, comfort. Spend some time in the menu system, discover how easy it is to switch modes and options. But don’t in any circumstances believe anything the Jessops sales reps say – most of them know nothing, and just push what they're told to sell at the punters, who usually also know nothing.
As far as spec is concerned, I think you should go beyond the one the girls have, but not necessarily up to the very top end. I don’t think you should go for one with a 35mm sensor unless you're prepared to spend a fortune, and then another on lenses, lots of time on weight training, and can clearly articulate your reasons for going that way.
In your position, I’d consider the Canon 60D, the Nikon D7000, and the Pentax K-5. I also wouldn’t buy from anywhere else except SRS Microsystems, where I got my K-5, and a number of lenses over the last few years. The slight inconvenience of a trip to Watford is far outweighed by their exceptional service (and in any case you can buy from them online too).
[/quote]
Comment by ChrisA posted on Canon/Nikon closest equivalents to the K-5? at 19/09/2011 - 17:38
I've just had another thought - it might be worth checking that Canon will actually autofocus with those lenses. Just like the Pentax KAF3 mount being in-lens motor only, there might be issues, especially with somne Nikon bodies.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Canon/Nikon closest equivalents to the K-5? at 19/09/2011 - 17:28
I think you made your choice Chris in a rational way, so your opinion will be good advice. I'm sure your friend will see whatever you say as genuine advice.
I bought the K10D largely because of its much-vaunted compatibility with old lenses, of which I had quite a few at the time.
We all know now that the K/M exposure problems are a real pain in the rear end, so that was completely the wrong reason for getting it (not that there weren't plenty of others I know about now), and I've now got rid of all those lenses I was originally planning to use with the K10.
Getting the K-5 was more rational, given the truckload (well, small mini-van, anyway) of lenses and flashguns that I now have.
I don't regret the decision, but getting into Pentax digital originally was entirely serendipitous, really.
My advice will indeed be genuine, for all that
Comment by ChrisA posted on Canon/Nikon closest equivalents to the K-5? at 19/09/2011 - 17:18
Actually might not be the case as Canon changed their lens mount, it depends on how long is a long time.
One of them is a 35-105, which is a reasonable range for film but a bit daft for APS-C, so IMO she should get rid of that anyway.
That leaves three 18-55s between them, and a Canon IS 70-300 (don't know which one).
It's a motley selection, which is why I think starting with a blank sheet of paper wouldn't be a bad idea - apart from the fact that there are already two 40Ds in the house.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Canon/Nikon closest equivalents to the K-5? at 19/09/2011 - 17:14
No, this is the right place. Note the full stop. General Digital Photography chat is for scanning, Photoshop, printers, etc.
Which is why I moved it here!
Seriously though, she won't get the compatibility that she'll get with Pentax and at the moment the K-5 price is looking hard to beat. Why point her towards something not as well made, pound for pound (or dollar for dollar depending where you are).
It's no good, me owning a Pentax and then saying to her, ooh, of course Pentax is the best - even if I think it is. Sounding like a fanboy when in reality, both Canon and Nikon make very good cameras too, would simply lack credibility.
The only way of influencing sensibly is to act impartially, even if I do think she should get rid of her rather mediocre set of Canon lenses and start again
Comment by ChrisA posted on Canon/Nikon closest equivalents to the K-5? at 19/09/2011 - 17:04
From what I can see at a cursory glance of specs, it would be the 60D and the D7000.
Would that make sense?
Comment by ChrisA posted on Canon/Nikon closest equivalents to the K-5? at 19/09/2011 - 16:52
Not really a topic for Pentax User Chris, much better put to a Canon or Nikon forum, who would know much more about it. They could start with the appropriate sections at EPZ, who in particular I think have a dedicated Nikon section.
The trouble with Canon and Nikon forums is that by the same token they're just as likely not to know much about Pentax, and since I know nothing about Canon or Nikon, I wouldn't be in a position to evaluate what they told me.
I thought that specifically asking Pentax users, given that many have cameras from other brands as well, would be the quickest route to information I could trust.
Surely that's not inappropriate?
They might as well go for a K-r plus two lenses, they will get much better value.
Edit: oops - I meant to put this into 'General Digital photography chat', which is for 'For any digital matters not concerning Pentax Digital SLRs or Optios'.
I now note that I put it in the Pentax DSLRs by mistake - apologies. Could a mod move it for me, please?
Comment by ChrisA posted on Canon/Nikon closest equivalents to the K-5? at 19/09/2011 - 16:43


Chris, negs were scanned in and I worked on them a little in Photoshop.