All Forum Comments
Comment by autumnlight posted on Few nighttime from my recent visit to Poland at 12/11/2016 - 17:16
Intentional Camera Movement John, not to everybody's taste, i suppose you could say the creative part of photography, some interesting results to those who find it interesting, a bit like Marmite
Perhaps you have to like Marmite to appreciate I C M (I C M = Intentional Camera Marmite?)
I'm not intending to sound rude, but I've had colour slides coming out like that and the best use I could find for them was to save the mount for something else! I'm positive had I entered any in a club photographic competition it would have been first to go with the comment, "Nothing's sharp, why did you enter it?"
Maybe times have changed but you can't unlearn the knowledge you picked up in the past. I can see the value of a blurry movement picture in a story sequence where perhaps a fugitive is running through the woods to escape capture, but not as a stand alone image.
I can also appreciate movement of trees in a photo may give the impression of a windy day, but at least the background and forest floor would have to be sharp. That might require combining several images to achieve. But a pure blurry photo just looks like it had the wrong exposure (I've had many of those) or the photo took itself accidentally between other intended shots (I can do that too) but I wouldn't normally like to embarrass myself publishing them to the world, other than to show things to avoid in a camera demonstration.
To me I C M is when one would do a panning shot of, say, a vehicle which itself may not be perfectly sharp if it was a slowish exposure but would have a definite blurry background. The blurriness tells the story of the vehicle speed. Another might be to zoom in on a vehicle coming towards you which achieves a similar, although different, result.
If I hadn't come from the 'old school' which says 'something has to be sharp in a photo' how would you sell me the idea of this new approach to I C M? I'm presuming this is now taught in art schools, or is it purely experimental?
Thanks for hearing me out.
Comment by autumnlight posted on Continuing my quest to better myself experimenting with I.C.M. all single images and hardly any treatment added except for the normal pp. at 09/11/2016 - 21:22
Comment by autumnlight posted on Continuing my quest to better myself experimenting with I.C.M. all single images and hardly any treatment added except for the normal pp. at 08/11/2016 - 23:06
Don't get it. Can someone explain please?
Comment by autumnlight posted on Continuing my quest to better myself experimenting with I.C.M. all single images and hardly any treatment added except for the normal pp. at 08/11/2016 - 23:04
Fantastic Maria. Especially 5,6,8 and 10. But the Washing Line...just brilliant
Comment by autumnlight posted on Continuing my quest to better myself experimenting with I.C.M. all single images and hardly any treatment added except for the normal pp. at 08/11/2016 - 13:32
Comment by autumnlight posted on Continuing my quest to better myself experimenting with I.C.M. all single images and hardly any treatment added except for the normal pp. at 08/11/2016 - 13:31
Palm

2
Puddle

3
washing line

4
Shed

5
Palm and red bucket

6
Flowers

7
Shed 2

8
Could be under water, you may notice a face on the top right hand side.

9
Pergola and Palm

10
Palm

Comment by autumnlight posted on Continuing my quest to better myself experimenting with I.C.M. all single images and hardly any treatment added except for the normal pp. at 07/11/2016 - 22:00
Comment by autumnlight posted on Burnham Beeches at 06/11/2016 - 15:44
Comment by autumnlight posted on Same but Different? at 03/11/2016 - 22:55
Comment by autumnlight posted on Ashdown Forest at 27/10/2016 - 22:40

