old legendary Pentax super tele star. PowerZoom. Some scrathes on the body. Some dust. Lenses without scratches. price 5200 $ without shipping

Another factor that suggests that the lens should not be very expensive - it is not a "star" series .. apparently there will be no ingress protection .. and apparently in order not to turn up the price .. I hope ..

Rhoufi-im sorry!!!

it is so according to your principle? I personally it is increasing the range of the zoom did not fundamentally change .. in contrast to the same intensity .. I'm a big fan of the Pentax but still need to look at things objectively .. and certainly if you talk about what one has got to do the comparison is clearly not in favor of Pentax. for example, the same Canon 400 f5.6 ... yes, and many other lenses .. I personally came to the Pentax because it had found in this system is the best combination of price and quality .. and as correctly noted colleagues to compete with the more popular systems, including the need to offer the best price

because the other participants in this discussion mentioned that Pentax is cheaper than other brands .. I also gave an example with this lens proves otherwise .. a point we have to pay for quality-of course I know! but the price must be reasonable! and then you can buy and Leica.

and I said that the 60-250 lens is bad? but the fact that the price is not cheap for a lens with an aperture is a fact! not less in any case than the other brands .. and if the 560 price is comparable, I'm afraid we do not like it ..

issue with this lens I am very worried! as the date of the sale, and of course the price! agrees that it is impossible to compare the lens 5.6 with 4 lenses! but on the other hand the price of 60-250 F4 is not very democratic!

and I am very sad such a small number of images! do at home football is not like football? surely no one has pictures if not the Champions League at least domestics kids chasing a ball?