All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on "Holiday" lens at 20/01/2009 - 22:05
I've got a trip to Mull planned in April and was hoping to be able to get the 60-250mm by then.
I might have to have a re-think and get the Sigma 70-200mm HSM F2.8 instead.
Has anyone used had experiences with this lens? (sample shots please ).
I already have the 300mm DA* so would would the 70-200mm F2.8 be a good companion or should I sit it out and wait for the 60-250mm.
I really don't think it can take that long before the 60-250 is here, it is already in the systems of the shops and they have an advice price.
Comment by Anvh posted on Why so long?? at 20/01/2009 - 18:28
They were pretty quick with the release date of the DA* 55mm btw I didn't knew of it after the road map but the DA* 60-250 is really taking a long time and we are still waiting
Comment by Anvh posted on Why so long?? at 20/01/2009 - 16:43
btw. the Tamron 70-300 is a better lens than Sigma and it's a lot cheaper, the only problem the lens have is that it suffer off CAs.
Comment by Anvh posted on what lens is best for motorsport at 18/01/2009 - 22:19
The bill is £10.00 each, totalling £30.00. .... a mistake by adding a bottle of wine costing £5.00 to their bill, which they did not order ....
allowing him to keep the remaining £2.00.
Now, if they each paid £10.00 initially, and received a refund of £1.00, they paid £9.00 each. 3 X £9.00 = £27.00, add to that the £2.00 kept by the waiter as his reward and that accounts for £29.00.
You can see where this is going now, where is the other £1.00 from their initial payment?
Comment by Anvh posted on OFF Topic.......Topic at 18/01/2009 - 18:23
The DA* and Sigma are quite comparable no real diffrence really.
Pentax would be weather-sealed and probable have better contrast, colours and bokeh.
other options in that range would be the 70-200 f/2.8 of Tamron or Sigma, both also fine lenses I've been told.
Comment by Anvh posted on Telephoto Zoom lenses at 18/01/2009 - 17:49
Comment by Anvh posted on SilkyPix and the Internet at 18/01/2009 - 17:38
The firewire 800 just limits the drives so if you've firewire 800 just stick with that since there isn't much reason to get an eSATA card for it.
If you don't have a firewire 800 then get an eSATA card since it's just a bit more expensive then a firewire 800 card.
firewire 800 card £37.50
eSATA card £40.07
Comment by Anvh posted on External Hard Drive recommendations? at 18/01/2009 - 16:46
Banding noise is most visible at high ISO speeds and in the shadows, or when an image has been excessively brightened. Banding noise can also increase for certain white balances, depending on camera model.
So check the white balance and see if anything has to do with it.
To soften the pain all the other manufacturers cameras also suffer.
The problems with the Nikon D300 were fixed with and firmware upgrade so maybe there might come a solution in the form of that
Comment by Anvh posted on K20D vertical banding at 18/01/2009 - 15:27
You also posted also in the other topic but will combine them into one here.
The WD studio is formatted for MAC but you can easly chance that so that it works on Windows so no worries there. You simply need to Format the disk to another kind of sytem file. MAC use HFS+ and Microsft use NTFS
Now about the connections, there is a nice table here link
if you have normall firewire, USB2 would be faster but like Shim said you can buy PCI cards with eSATA that you can connect to your motheroard.
eSATA card you can also save money like Pete said and get the cable I showed you link but that won't be Plug & play like he said
To give you some times, your backup of 75GB (76 800MB) will take theoratically;
USB2 = 21 minutes
Firewire 400 = 26 minutes
Firewrie 800 = 13 mintues
eSATA = 4.5 minutes
Like I said these are theoratical numbers, so it will take some longer in the real world.
Comment by Anvh posted on External Hard Drive recommendations? at 18/01/2009 - 14:58


I have a 18-250 myself and it's quite a nice lens the only drawback I've is that it doesn't have quick-shift and I'm really missing that, for the rest it does his job well.
There is also an option for just 2 lenses, the kit lens or 16-45 with the DA 55-300. They both aren't heavy which the 18-250 is and the IQ is better. The 55-300 would be fine for almost all outdoor things and the 16-45 for the indoor activities. That would be my kit I think.