All Forum Comments
Comment by Algernon posted on Rhoose Beach ... again! at 26/03/2019 - 15:13
Looks good HG
Is that all Fuel Tank or does it have a built in Wi$$y Warmer!
--
Is that all Fuel Tank or does it have a built in Wi$$y Warmer!
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 25/03/2019 - 19:49
Welcome Miles I've seen your posts on DPR and found them very interesting especially the ones where you have done lens tests. You seem to be one of the few positive people are on that site.
--
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Hello from Corfu at 21/03/2019 - 10:49
I wonder how old that reply is? Probably from pre-K-1 days.
Is Sebastian the CAT?
It's already been stated that the flagship will be a completely new camera and not a further development of the K-3 although the size will be almost the same.
--
Is Sebastian the CAT?
It's already been stated that the flagship will be a completely new camera and not a further development of the K-3 although the size will be almost the same.
--
Comment by Algernon posted on What next Pentax DSLRs? at 20/03/2019 - 16:58
For anyone wanting the utmost quality..... nothing comes close to Pentax Pixel Shift..... Years ahead of the opposition.
It's not widely appreciated that PS improves high ISO shots to a level well above anything possible with other cameras.
--
It's not widely appreciated that PS improves high ISO shots to a level well above anything possible with other cameras.
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Justification at 13/03/2019 - 08:09
Pentax cameras are all made to produce top results. They don't make any budget junk with mirrors where pentaprisms should be etc.
They are also much better value for money than other makes. A FF outfit from Pentax is
$5,500 dollars cheaper than the equivalent Canon gear. See........
Sony FE: $20,380
Canon EF: $18,590
Nikon F: $19,014
Pentax K: $13,073
pasted from:
https://petapixel.com/2019/03/08/how-much-a-full-pro-camera-and-lens-set-costs-f...
K-1 Review
https://youtu.be/TW-ZADg2AWE
=====
They are also much better value for money than other makes. A FF outfit from Pentax is
$5,500 dollars cheaper than the equivalent Canon gear. See........
Sony FE: $20,380
Canon EF: $18,590
Nikon F: $19,014
Pentax K: $13,073
pasted from:
https://petapixel.com/2019/03/08/how-much-a-full-pro-camera-and-lens-set-costs-f...
K-1 Review
https://youtu.be/TW-ZADg2AWE
=====
Comment by Algernon posted on Justification at 12/03/2019 - 18:18
The new lens looks superb to me. Some tests from Japan....
https://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk/2019/02/hdpentaxfa35mmf2,tsukigase.html
--
https://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk/2019/02/hdpentaxfa35mmf2,tsukigase.html
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Do I need the new FA 35mm f2.0? at 09/03/2019 - 13:13
NCD must vary between insurance companies. Some only go to 5 or 6 and that is all they put on the renewal notice and is all the proof you will have. So only give that figure when asking for quotes next year or later.
--
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 06/03/2019 - 07:56
It helps if you drink beer They know that your not going to try and drive with a pint glass in your hand ........ It would get spilled and no beer drinker does that ........ Whisky drinkers on the other hand have hip flasks etc
--
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 05/03/2019 - 11:39
--