Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
The OP might find this recent discussion about
K-5 Magenta casts of interest:

link

One of the best tests I've found for PF is to photograph
an old folder with plenty of chrome on it in sunlight.
I used a Super Ikonta.

Comment by Algernon posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 13:24

Algernon
I think you need to go back to the reviews of the K-5.
Many of these listed PF as a problem in the pros and cons
I'm surprised this hasn't been taken in

"I still would like to see a firmware fix from Pentax regarding
purple fringing, as it’s one big image quality concern for an
otherwise very good camera."
LINK

Eric discussed it here: link

One of many threads on here that mentions it: link

Also discussed here:
http://photo.net/pentax-camera-forum/00Y8lo

-

Comment by Algernon posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 12:21

Algernon
johnriley wrote:
Are you reading the same thing as I am there Algi? It clearly shows for the 35mm f2.4 lens that CA is lower using the K-5.
Eric used the K-7 for nearly all of his tests because of PF problems with the K-5.

These are most of the K-7 tests:

http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?cat=81

He's since standardised on an NEX-3 purely because it will
take almost any make of lens.

http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?cat=72

Comment by Algernon posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 11:48

Algernon
Somewhere in the distant past

It's also been pointed out in lens tests such as:

http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=511

"The K-7 sensor is inferior in ways, but not in all.
It is definitely better with purple fringing.
Would I take the K-5 sensor over it for most applications? Yes."


Direct link to shots showing the fringing:

http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=511&page=4

Comment by Algernon posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 11:13

Algernon
It's been covered on this forum before

Comment by Algernon posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 10:18

Algernon
The K-5 is known to have worse CA than the K-7, K20D etc.

Comment by Algernon posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 09:06

Algernon
You could cut a hole in an end cap and attach it.

The CZ Pancolor is a good lens but they aren't cheap.

Comment by Algernon posted on M42 for Bellows at 08/07/2012 - 20:57

Algernon
If you have a K mount 50mm you can use a reversing ring to
fit it to the bellows.

The Takumar 55mm f/1.8's are good. You could also try a 55mm
Chinon f/1.7 for about £25

The extension tube at the camera lens will restrict you to
quite large magnifications.

A K bellows is much more useful. I have the Pentax K set,
but I'm just messing around with a Novoflex bellows that
looks to be M42, but is actually about M41.3 and I can't
fit any lenses to it

Comment by Algernon posted on M42 for Bellows at 08/07/2012 - 18:39

Algernon
greynolds999 wrote:
I have a solution which is a little different using one of these.

Basically it's a mini copier and it is a dream to use. Plug the USB lead from your camera into the 'copy from end' then plug pretty much anything in the other end which has a USB connector such as a card reader, disk drive, even an iPod or Android Phone in data mode) and it will copy without a computer.
Should be good when they bring out a USB 3 version

Comment by Algernon posted on Backing up - is there a small mobile device out there? at 08/07/2012 - 13:22

Algernon
Smeggypants wrote:

Xara 3D ??? Isn't that a 3D graphics program??
YES!!

Comment by Algernon posted on Now that me.com has ended. at 08/07/2012 - 08:44

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo