All Forum Comments
Comment by Acliff posted on P30N and MX at 19/12/2005 - 18:15
Is it worth it? Its an old flash, with from what I gather excellent performance and reviews. I haven't yet upgraded to DSLR yet, i'm still with my MX and MZ5.
I think I can probably get the flash seperately for about 50, but what should I do?
Comment by Acliff posted on AF280T + grip opportunity? at 04/09/2005 - 18:47
Which actually isn't a bad idea...
Comment by Acliff posted on mz5 flash popup doesn't work! at 02/09/2005 - 15:15
Is there a quick fix for this? And if not, how much would it be to repair?
When the flash part is held up, it works perfectly, its just it won't *stay* up.
Thanks in advance!
-Cliff
Comment by Acliff posted on mz5 flash popup doesn't work! at 01/09/2005 - 10:05
Its not the cheapest thing in the world though.....
I have to say, the thought of a DS2, 12-24mm DA, and AF540FGZ flash reallly really appeals...
Comment by Acliff posted on 12-24mm DA finally announced!! at 22/08/2005 - 21:27
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0508/05082101pentaxistds2.asp
So not that different from the DS, just slightly streamlined controls, ala DL, 2.5inch lcd, possibly slightly better image quality.
Bit disappointing, but for new users, they get an improved DS. And we love the DS, so how could it be so bad?
Who needs to go on safari, when there's monstrous great aphids like those in your garden
Comment by Acliff posted on Pentax FA 80-320mm F4.5-5.6 vs Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG at 26/08/2005 - 08:03
We wish.
I'm still uncertain as to whether to get the *ist-d or ds. While they're both around retail, it makes the decision harder. The d has 2 command dials, Hyper modes, bar graph exposure meter display in the view finder.
The d is smaller, slightly more comfortable, faster, and has $100 cashback offer on it at the moment.
I will probably use aperture priority mostly, some exposure compensation and my current selection of pentax m/a lenses. I will start investing in newer pentax glass at a later date, but I want to start taking pictures soon.
I'm going more towards the ds, because it will cost me around 520 quid overall, which is extremely cheap.
(although the olympus e200 can be found for £399!!!!! )
Comment by Acliff posted on No more *ist-D?? at 28/06/2005 - 23:45
I would prefer the aperture ring, due to its compatability with my MX.
Now you're saying that the aperture ring doesn't register with the digital SLRs at all? Even the A, F, FA, and FAD ones? Even with the aperture ring enabled mode on?
hmmm... thats disappointing...
To be honest though, I use aperture priority most, so the above wouldn't be too big an issue, because I assume the dial would become a aperture dial exclusively?
In any case, heres to hoping that they produce a firmware which enables full aperture ring use, at least on the more modern lenses. Will make my lens buying decisions for both the soon to be bought DS and my MX easier.
Comment by Acliff posted on Aperture rings, yes or no? at 23/06/2005 - 23:54
It seems that lots of people are getting rid of aperture rings, due to the availability of apertures on the wheel on the camera.
The 2 new D-FA lenses are a godsend due to the fact they have aperture rings, and large focus grips.
What are your opinions on the aperture wheel? Considering the *IST ds has 1 dial, I'd like to reserve this to shutter speed.
When I get my IST* ds soon, i'll be buying lenses with an aperture dial , not important as that may be.
Comment by Acliff posted on Aperture rings, yes or no? at 23/06/2005 - 01:24


I'm selling it with a 50mm F1.4, but if you want it, I could cancel the ebay, and sell you just the body. PM me if you're interested.